BREAKING: Federal Lawsuit Filed Challenging Trump Bump-Stock Ban; Injunction Sought

Inigoes · Mar 28, 2019

Doctor_M said:
Wow... no explanation at all, just a curt "piss off". Is that the norm?

Pretty much for all denials. Comes from the death sentence stay requests, I guess.

danb · Mar 28, 2019

Yes, that is the norm

Not_an_outlaw · Mar 28, 2019

danb said:
GOA reply:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/18/18A963/93353/20190327111258989_GOA SCOTUS Stay reply.pdf

I think this is an awesome response. Maybe a bit too much in the "in your face mantra." Is does so without saying that this type of government behavior is what has lead to fascism where there really is no real rule of law, and the government can make any argument and deem it acceptable.

esqappellate · Mar 28, 2019

Doctor_M said:
Wow... no explanation at all, just a curt "piss off". Is that the norm?

Yes, that's the norm. Even when there is a dissent (and there was none here).

ironpony · Mar 28, 2019

Give them an inch ...

ReviledExpat · Mar 28, 2019

So now we know what will happen if "assault weapons" or "high capacity magazines" are banned in the same fashion. The Supreme Court will happily sign off on it while our property that we paid for is deemed illegal with no compensation. Lovely. **** you Roberts. I hope you get a tumor.

ReviledExpat · Mar 28, 2019

Also, shame on anyone who turned them in. Complying with an unjust law makes one a party to it. I certainly have never turned in any of my 30 round magazines or my collapsible stocks.

wolfwood · Mar 28, 2019

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sfKtyertvKM

Stoveman · Mar 28, 2019

wolfwood said:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sfKtyertvKM

Little help.

pcfixer · Mar 28, 2019

Stoveman said:
Little help.

"Someday"

ironpony · Mar 29, 2019

Last night my parents said Trump received a huge applause when he mentioned

Hold on some fool is knocking on my door

srephwed · Mar 29, 2019

Gotta be a sleezy lawyer somewhere for a class action breach of contract lawsuit. I spent real money on a cheezy piece of plastic because the ATF said it was okay. Sons a beaches!

PowPow · Mar 29, 2019

We have a lot of pretty awesome lawyers who read and post on this forum. However, I'm fairly certain most would agree with your assessment of the folks who put the rule change in place.

krucam · Apr 1, 2019

Josh Blackman on Twitter dissecting some of this...

https://twitter.com/JoshMBlackman/status/1112747205885083650

DC Circuit ruled on another case, Guedes/Firearms Policy v ATF.
CADC Case: 19-5042 (Consolidated with 19-5044)

Opinion is Attached.

04/01/2019 Open Document PER CURIAM JUDGMENT [1780390] filed it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the District Court’s denial of the preliminary injunction appealed from in these causes be affirmed, in accordance with the opinion of the court filed herein this date. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the administrative stay of the effective date of the Bump Stock Rule, 83 Fed. Reg. 66,514 (Dec. 26, 2018), that was entered on the court’s own motion on March 23, 2019, will remain in effect for 48 hours from the time of the issuance of the opinion in this case to allow plaintiffs, if they wish, to seek a stay from the Supreme Court of the United States. Should plaintiffs do so, the administrative stay will remain in effect pending disposition of the stay application. Plaintiffs are directed to notify the court promptly should an application for a stay be filed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Codrea plaintiffs-appellants’ notice of voluntary dismissal of Whitaker-based claim in No. 19-5044, construed by the court as a motion for voluntary dismissal, be denied. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate pending resolution of any stay application filed in the Supreme Court. Plaintiffs are directed to notify the court promptly of the disposition of a stay application. If plaintiffs do not seek a stay from the Supreme Court, the Clerk is directed to issue the mandate 48 hours after the opinion in these consolidated cases issues. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41(a)(1). [19-5042, 19-5044] [Entered: 04/01/2019 11:02 AM]

04/01/2019 Open Document OPINION [1780398] filed PER CURIAM OPINION (Pages: 59), CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART OPINION (Pages: 27) by Judge Henderson. [19-5042, 19-5044] [Entered: 04/01/2019 11:14 AM]

Boxcab · Apr 1, 2019

On word and up word?

.

2ndMDRebel · Apr 1, 2019

Thanks again OTrumpa!

Doctor_M · Apr 1, 2019

Meaningless ruling... all it did was confirm for most respectable citizens that the law is an ass. I've see one person on this board who stated that they destroyed or turned in their contraband items. If 1% are gone nationally, I will be surprised.

The feds have not yet figured out that is profoundly not in their interest to pass laws so silly that even the law abiding refuse to comply.

wolfwood · Apr 1, 2019

cert petition is next

ironpony · Apr 2, 2019

Boxcab said:
On word and up word?

.

Word!

krucam · Apr 2, 2019

wolfwood said:
cert petition is next

Liked Blackman's reference to the Chevron Deference being a nice 'ribbon' for the package...good luck...

BREAKING: Federal Lawsuit Filed Challenging Trump Bump-Stock Ban; Injunction Sought

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

Head'n for the hills

dont be a dumbass

Ultimate Member

President, MSI

Member

Banned

Banned

Ultimate Member

TV Personality

Ultimate Member

Member

Active Member

Where's the beef?

Ultimate Member

Attachments

MSI EM

Ultimate Member

Certified Mad Scientist

Ultimate Member

Member

Ultimate Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Log in

Forum statistics