Sherrif David Clarke takes down Clinton News Network's Don Lemon

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • T'Challa

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Apr 24, 2013
    2,179
    Wakanda
    I watched the round two video and Lemon presented many facts. (ie. Harvard report, Data from Washington Post) and Clarke only mentioned the Harvard report and got it wrong.) I agree with Clarke's condemnation of hate against cops. Clarke is solid on guns but shaky on other topics.
     

    EL1227

    R.I.P.
    Patriot Picket
    Nov 14, 2010
    20,274
    Look at their body language and eye contact ... Lemmon needs a 'safe place' :innocent0

    This was a 'set-up' by Lemmon, or at least an attempted set-up. Clarke is a featured speaker at the convention and a strong voice for law enforcement as well as the black community. Lemmon was hoping to get a 'gotcha moment' on tape, or a sound byte that could be extracted out of context to discredit Clarke.

    Even accepting T-Challa's assertion that "Clarke is solid on guns but shaky on other topics", He got neither ...
     

    tkd4life

    Ultimate Member
    Sep 10, 2010
    1,737
    Southern Maryland
    I watched the round two video and Lemon presented many facts. (ie. Harvard report, Data from Washington Post) and Clarke only mentioned the Harvard report and got it wrong.) I agree with Clarke's condemnation of hate against cops. Clarke is solid on guns but shaky on other topics.

    Yea Clarke didn't really listen very well during the interview. He claims that there is no data to suggest the cops are targeting African Americans. Well there is data that shows that African Americans are shot at a disproportionate rate than whites. When percentage of population is taken into account, African Americans are more likely to be shot by police. This is what the Washington Post data says.

    I get his dislike of BLM, but he doesn't quite have his facts right.
     

    KL1

    Member
    Feb 6, 2013
    85
    Northern MoCo
    Well there is data that shows that African Americans are shot at a disproportionate rate than whites. When percentage of population is taken into account, African Americans are more likely to be shot by police. This is what the Washington Post data says.

    Just like many things with statistics, a lot depends on how you do the analysis. I'm pretty sure that when you look at the data in terms of percentage of police interactions instead of percentage of population, white men are significantly more likely to be shot by police than black men. Unfortunately I don't have the time to look up the references right now. But it does seem like maybe Clarke was not prepared with good evidence to back up his claims. That doesn't mean there isn't evidence to counter the data Lemmon cited.
     

    babalou

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Aug 12, 2013
    16,212
    Glenelg
    stats

    Just like many things with statistics, a lot depends on how you do the analysis. I'm pretty sure that when you look at the data in terms of percentage of police interactions instead of percentage of population, white men are significantly more likely to be shot by police than black men. Unfortunately I don't have the time to look up the references right now. But it does seem like maybe Clarke was not prepared with good evidence to back up his claims. That doesn't mean there isn't evidence to counter the data Lemmon cited.

    One of the other threads here has a link to statistics about the misconception of blacks being killed by cops more than whites. It goes into the crime rate, etc. It is a very good read. I tried to peruse the Baton Rouge thread because I thought it was in there but I do not have the time. Whoever wrote that post, if you see this, please re-link the url. Thanks.
     

    tkd4life

    Ultimate Member
    Sep 10, 2010
    1,737
    Southern Maryland
    Just like many things with statistics, a lot depends on how you do the analysis. I'm pretty sure that when you look at the data in terms of percentage of police interactions instead of percentage of population, white men are significantly more likely to be shot by police than black men. Unfortunately I don't have the time to look up the references right now. But it does seem like maybe Clarke was not prepared with good evidence to back up his claims. That doesn't mean there isn't evidence to counter the data Lemmon cited.

    I agree 100%. And after a quick little search using the FBI crime statistics for 2014 I found that when African Americans are about 3.7 times more likely to be arrested for Violent Crimes in this country than white's are. It would only makes sense that due to the fact that cops are interacting with a specific race almost 4 times as much in the enforcement of violent crimes that there would be more police shootings of said group. When it looks like that when violent crimes are taken into account, there is no meaningful difference between races involved in police shootings. Blacks are arrested about 3 times more for violent crime, and they are also killed by police about 3 times more as well. Data summarized below.

    Population: 2010 Census= 308,745,000, %White = 72.4% or 223,531,000, %Black = 12.8% or 38,902,000

    2014 violent crimes arrests based on race = White = 231,750, Black = 147,002.

    2014 Violent Crimes divided by race per million people =
    White= 231,750/223.531=1036 arrests/million people
    Black= 147,002/38.902=3779 arrests/million people.

    Washington Post data= Police Killings by race White = 449 people, Black = 241.
    Killings per million people =
    White=449/223.531= 2.008 killed/million people
    Black=241/38.902 = 6.195 killed/million people
     

    jbrown50

    Ultimate Member
    Sep 18, 2014
    3,474
    DC
    Yea Clarke didn't really listen very well during the interview. He claims that there is no data to suggest the cops are targeting African Americans. Well there is data that shows that African Americans are shot at a disproportionate rate than whites. When percentage of population is taken into account, African Americans are more likely to be shot by police. This is what the Washington Post data says.

    I get his dislike of BLM, but he doesn't quite have his facts right.

    African Americans are over represented by crime. Clark said that, and he's right. Check out the FBI statistics, then check out the locations. In urban areas where crime rates are the highest the black population is also the highest. The overwhelming majority of these areas are also governed by, get this......democratic politicians. Democratic policies, for the last 50 years, have fostered this disparity and have failed the black community. The welfare mentality, socialist policies, poor leadership, overly aggressive policing to try and compensate for the high crime rates caused by the first three? Yes.

    You can't have your cake and eat it too. You can't claim the disproportionate numbers, then not take responsibility for them. They are on your watch.
     

    T'Challa

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Apr 24, 2013
    2,179
    Wakanda
    Yea Clarke didn't really listen very well during the interview. He claims that there is no data to suggest the cops are targeting African Americans. Well there is data that shows that African Americans are shot at a disproportionate rate than whites. When percentage of population is taken into account, African Americans are more likely to be shot by police. This is what the Washington Post data says.

    I get his dislike of BLM, but he doesn't quite have his facts right.

    Just like many things with statistics, a lot depends on how you do the analysis. I'm pretty sure that when you look at the data in terms of percentage of police interactions instead of percentage of population, white men are significantly more likely to be shot by police than black men. Unfortunately I don't have the time to look up the references right now. But it does seem like maybe Clarke was not prepared with good evidence to back up his claims. That doesn't mean there isn't evidence to counter the data Lemmon cited.

    One of the other threads here has a link to statistics about the misconception of blacks being killed by cops more than whites. It goes into the crime rate, etc. It is a very good read. I tried to peruse the Baton Rouge thread because I thought it was in there but I do not have the time. Whoever wrote that post, if you see this, please re-link the url. Thanks.

    I agree 100%. And after a quick little search using the FBI crime statistics for 2014 I found that when African Americans are about 3.7 times more likely to be arrested for Violent Crimes in this country than white's are. It would only makes sense that due to the fact that cops are interacting with a specific race almost 4 times as much in the enforcement of violent crimes that there would be more police shootings of said group. When it looks like that when violent crimes are taken into account, there is no meaningful difference between races involved in police shootings. Blacks are arrested about 3 times more for violent crime, and they are also killed by police about 3 times more as well. Data summarized below.

    Population: 2010 Census= 308,745,000, %White = 72.4% or 223,531,000, %Black = 12.8% or 38,902,000

    2014 violent crimes arrests based on race = White = 231,750, Black = 147,002.

    2014 Violent Crimes divided by race per million people =
    White= 231,750/223.531=1036 arrests/million people
    Black= 147,002/38.902=3779 arrests/million people.

    Washington Post data= Police Killings by race White = 449 people, Black = 241.
    Killings per million people =
    White=449/223.531= 2.008 killed/million people
    Black=241/38.902 = 6.195 killed/million people

    Figures don't lie, but liars will figure. The Washington Post research appears to be sound no matter how you are looking at it. TKD4Life's post appears to show the evidence of blacks being more likely to be arrested by police, killed by police etc. Also, the narrative that Clarke accentuation about black on black crime feel on deaf ears. Most crimes against people are usually perpetrated by a person of the same ethnicity group. Clarke could have easily added Asian on Asian crime to his statements. He did not seem well prepared to answer questions and he lacked facts.
     

    T'Challa

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Apr 24, 2013
    2,179
    Wakanda
    African Americans are over represented by crime. Clark said that, and he's right. Check out the FBI statistics, then check out the locations. In urban areas where crime rates are the highest the black population is also the highest. The overwhelming majority of these areas are also governed by, get this......democratic politicians. Democratic policies, for the last 50 years, have fostered this disparity and have failed the black community. The welfare mentality, socialist policies, poor leadership, overly aggressive policing to try and compensate for the high crime rates caused by the first three? Yes.

    You can't have your cake and eat it too. You can't claim the disproportionate numbers, then not take responsibility for them. They are on your watch.

    I would be cautious to add the liberal slant to inner city crimes as we all know that blacks in America overwhelmingly vote Dem. We also know that inner cities have the highest concentration of blacks.... if blacks are more likely to be policed by police, then crime rates will be skewed upward. It is no secret that our Justice system treats persons of color more harshly than white Americans. This fact is part of the problem. Now we can add politics into the mix and say that Dem's have NOT called very loud for revamping the justice system and I have not heard any call to do so by the GOP. You can blame every President from Johnson to Obama with the latter doing a little bit to speak on the issue in the past 24 months. Dem....GOP.... Two sides of the same coin I guess.
     

    danb

    dont be a dumbass
    Feb 24, 2013
    22,704
    google is your friend, I am not.
    Sorry I just don't agree that Clark was ill-prepared. He was not even allowed to finish his sentences. He didn't agree with the premise of the question to begin with. Lemon presented a rhetorical straw man.

    I think it was Lemon who was not prepared to confront Clarke. Lemons was in disbelief that Clarke would not actually accept the narrative.
     

    RossL

    Member
    Dec 29, 2015
    78
    Agree or disagree. We need more people who actually speak how they feel to fix the problem, not these Hallmark card responses we always hear.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,825
    Messages
    7,297,422
    Members
    33,526
    Latest member
    Comotion357

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom