Putting on my magic hat:
En banc hearing in Dec 2020, En Banc rules the restriction is constitutional.
Appealed to Supreme Court.... Hearing in 2021, Roberts write majority opinion upholding restriction.
Build on the little victories.
Chief Justice Roberts Jr cares about one thing, his legacy. Sad what vanity does to a man who could have been as great as Scalia.
No word yet whether CA will appeal for an en banc hearing or whether they will ask a judge to stay the ruling until a full appeal is heard. You can bet CA residents will be ordering as many 10+ capacity magazines as they can find.
It's probably a good or even better time to be a magazine maker or reseller.
Putting on my magic hat:
En banc hearing in Dec 2020, En Banc rules the restriction is constitutional.
Appealed to Supreme Court.... Hearing in 2021, Roberts write majority opinion upholding restriction.
Awesome!!! More importantly, for his work in the most infringing jurisdiction in the country,
PAGING @wolfwood !!!
How does this 9th circus ruling effect Hawaii? Iirc they have similar state laws.
As others have said, if this survives en banc, it’ll be so cool to watch them eat a plate full of crap too!
That said, here goes a huge run on mags! All that pent up demand on the left coast!
Putting on my magic hat:
En banc hearing in Dec 2020, En Banc rules the restriction is constitutional.
Appealed to Supreme Court.... Hearing in 2021, Roberts write majority opinion upholding restriction.
En banc in 3....2....1....
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
What’s En banc?
Simple layman’s explanation.
The case here got heard by 3 judges selected from the 9th circuit. And was rule for the pro2a side, against the state.
Loser feels the ruling is wrong.
They appeal to the FULL set of judges on the 9th circuit. I don’t recall exactly how many, but google or our legal eagles can answer precisely. Maybe 13?15? I’ll defer to the lawyers that respond.
That’s the “en banc” part. Not just the 3 judges on the normal panel, but ALL of the judges rehear the case.
They group appealing hopes their loss to the 3 judge panel is overturned.
Can we now buy high capacity magazines in Maryland?
Hawaii is in the 9CA, so this would affect them. I'm sure the politicians there will find some way around it.
Probably require a serial number provided by the state, and then never issue one.
Removing suppressors from the NFA hasn't happened under a Republican Senate, house, or president. We need to demand more than the bare minimum, because that's pathetic. Also to quote a ban-happy Trump:Any President can "not like" anything he wants, but it hardly has the force of legislation.
Build on the little victories.
Let Ca take the DC approach. They keep regular mag sizes and let the 4th circuit suffer. Don't want the SCOTUS to make the decision.
I look forward to being told that the founders only had single shot muskets even though the Girardoni air rifle and the Kalthoff repeater existed.
No. Trump is ramming them through with Mitch. The are completely ignoring the screams of the Cali senators crying foul because they are not consulting with the local senators on the appointments.Man, if this survives en banc, it's the case we need.
Also, the Trump crowd needs to get real, any GOP president would have made the same judicial picks. I guarantee Trump isn't the guy picking those names out.
Simple layman’s explanation.
The case here got heard by 3 judges selected from the 9th circuit. And was rule for the pro2a side, against the state.
Loser feels the ruling is wrong.
They appeal to the FULL set of judges on the 9th circuit. I don’t recall exactly how many, but google or our legal eagles can answer precisely. Maybe 13?15? I’ll defer to the lawyers that respond.
That’s the “en banc” part. Not just the 3 judges on the normal panel, but ALL of the judges rehear the case.
They group appealing hopes their loss to the 3 judge panel is overturned.