Potential legal trouble using >10-round magazine during home defense situation

Won't open on my phone.
What is it?

Threeband said:

Won't open on my phone.
What is it?

Click to expand...

HB 991 , Prohibit possession >10rd magazine

lol, the stupidity it burns. This is the kind of weapon confiscated based on the Baltimore City PD page:

Schipperke said:

HB 991 , Prohibit possession >10rd magazine

Click to expand...

I won’t comply.

Just saw it on FB. Came here to post the link to the bill.

teratos said:

I won’t comply.

Click to expand...

You can do three years standing on your head..

I'm allergic to prison, judges and lawyers..

Schipperke said:

You can do three years standing on your head..

I'm allergic to prison, judges and lawyers..

Click to expand...

People are under no obligation to follow an Unconstitutional law.

California judge opinion striking down similar CA law Prop 63:

http://michellawyers.com/wp-content...rra_Order-Granting-Preliminary-Injunction.pdf

p43:

For example, the Attorney General submits the expert declaration of a professor of health policy and management. See Declaration of Daniel W. Webster (filed 6/5/17).

Although the expert offers many opinions about the public safety threat posed by magazines holding any more than 10 rounds, he concedes that robust supporting data is missing. “To date, there are no studies that have examined separately the effects of an assault weapons ban, on the one hand, and a LCM ban, on the other hand . . . .” Id. at¶ 25 (emphasis added). He then opines that the largest protective effect of these bans comes from restricting magazines holding any more than 10 rounds because “LCMs are used much more frequently than assault weapons.” As discussed earlier, however, the Mayor’s survey paints a different picture. Without the benefit of unbiased, scientifically collected empirical data, it is unclear upon what evidence Professor Webster is basing his opinions.

Click to expand...

In other words.... Webster's opinion is sheer speculation. (shocker!)

Daniel Webster should get the liar liar pants on fire trophy. He always contradicts himself in front of actual judges.

The lawlessness, the fear tactics and propaganda, election campaigns run on promises to infringe on others right, the violations of our rights and the trampling of the Constitution will continue until they are held accountable for their actions. The violations they commit are more vile than the crime they claim they're trying to fix, they know this..we know this.. Their mission is to destroy the Constitution, there will be no accountability from the Courts, the communist progressives have infiltrated nearly every aspect. Even if they rule these unjust laws violations...they cannot right the harm theyve done, they will not prosecute and punish the violators, so they will continue to destroy and violate. There should be severe consequences for even submitting bills that infringe the highest laws of this Nation and violate free people. If an entity foreign or domestic or even a person commits an act of war against a branch of the military, whether espionage or propaganda or any other attack...they are held accountable, and in some cases before a Military Tribunal. A well regulated militia should have the same right to a Military Tribunal as any military branch of the government. Its been decades since this Country has had a "we the people" friendly President and administration, never before has it so reveling and evident of the amount of infiltration of domestic terrorist attempting to destroy our democracy. I believe The Commander and Chief would be in favor of supporting our Constitutional right to a well regulated militia.

teratos said:

People are under no obligation to follow an Unconstitutional law.

Click to expand...

The good Doctor is 100% correct, as usual.

You will not be alone in non-compliance, Sir, when push comes to shove.

danb said:

California judge opinion striking down similar CA law Prop 63:

http://michellawyers.com/wp-content...rra_Order-Granting-Preliminary-Injunction.pdf

p43:


In other words.... Webster's opinion is sheer speculation. (shocker!)

Daniel Webster should get the liar liar pants on fire trophy. He always contradicts himself in front of actual judges.

Click to expand...

Good stuff, could be useful at hearing.

Doctor_M said:

The good Doctor is 100% correct, as usual.

You will not be alone in non-compliance, Sir, when push comes to shove.

Click to expand...

Thank you, Doctor.

Great info on this thread!