Hawaii passes resolution urging Congress to repeal 2a
- Thread starter Rab1515
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
WeaponsCollector
EXTREME GUN OWNER
- Feb 17, 2011
- 14,024
HEHEHEHE I guess they do not know how an amendment or repeal of one works. Congress does not have the super majority it needs. And there are not 37 other states that would agree.
Money_B_85
Member
- Mar 30, 2017
- 52
37 states would need to support it even if it passes the House and Senate. Meaning 14 states would have to oppose it and the repeal dies. Opposing states...Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Georgia, Florida, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Montana, Idaho, Missouri, Oklahoma, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Kansas, West Virginia, Arizona, Utah, New Mexico, Texas....I haven’t even gotten to purple states like Pennsylvania and Virginia...Publicity stunt
MigraineMan
Defenestration Specialist
Well, they "did something" and, if it doesn't pass, they can claim "those big-meanie extreme home-grown terr'ists stopped them. "
(at least they asked "pretty please, make it a collective right")
(at least they asked "pretty please, make it a collective right")
hillbilly grandpa
Active Member
I think only 13 states need to reject the amendment, not 14. Three quarters of 50 is 37.5. You round up to 38, since 37 would be less than 75%. That leaves 13. But that's just math as I learned it in WV public schools. 
dist1646
Ultimate Member
What else would you expect from a state that claims Obama was born there!
Boondock Saint
Ultimate Member
They are idiots and/or reptiles.
shootin the breeze
Missed it by that much
WILL NOT COMPLY!!
I swear, like the American Civil War 2 thread pointed out: it seems like it will take a bloodbath for these morons to figure it out.
I swear, like the American Civil War 2 thread pointed out: it seems like it will take a bloodbath for these morons to figure it out.
jollymon
Active Member
There just trying to out liberal California and just as stupid .
I'll take this as a GOOD thing. Because it means they're shifting away from the "all you gun nuts are mis-interpreting the 2A" over to "you're right what it means, and we don't like it, so we want it to go away." That's a victory, as far as I'm concerned.
Good point.
I believe you are right.
dgapilot
Active Member
At least they are being honest about their intent, not like all the others that say “ I believe in the 2nd Amendment but . . .”
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
delaware_export
Ultimate Member
- Apr 10, 2018
- 3,226
i think this ties in with the young case, to some extent, that wolfwood is running. yeah, young is on hold, but i think they see that even if they get an en banc victory, complete denial of any form of carry will get killed by scotus. MAYBE??
Nah, I think this is just virtue signaling. They know perfectly well what it takes to fundamentally change the Bill of Rights, and that they'll never get 37 states to agree with them. Hell, we've got that many states and more that are shall-issue for carry. Think they're going to agree to stop protecting themselves from government infringement on their right to self defense? Not going to happen. So, this is all just pandering to Pacific Progressives.
- Dec 30, 2012
- 6,999
Matt Bracken was right.....
Users who are viewing this thread
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
Suggestions for a low powered, large objective rifle scope? (6 Viewers)- Started by E.Shell
- Replies: 10
-
-
Timonium Gun Show April 27-28 (Timonium Fairgrounds Exhibition Hall)
- Started by joro55
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
-