Haides
Ultimate Member
Do revolvers have to have these locks too? And is it new purchases only, or do transfers from a private seller need them too?
the Ruger Mark III and probably Mark IV have an integrated safety which requires a special tool (allen wrench?). Don't remember because I've lost my tool.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
the question I have is what is the reasoning that a cable lock is not sufficient? I understand it's the law, but what was the argument when the law was implemented that said cable locks were no good? and can we get this amended to be able to use the simpler locks? (Maryland I know, so zero chance of getting the law amended)
the question I have is what is the reasoning that a cable lock is not sufficient? I understand it's the law, but what was the argument when the law was implemented that said cable locks were no good? and can we get this amended to be able to use the simpler locks? (Maryland I know, so zero chance of getting the law amended)
the question I have is what is the reasoning that a cable lock is not sufficient? I understand it's the law, but what was the argument when the law was implemented that said cable locks were no good? and can we get this amended to be able to use the simpler locks? (Maryland I know, so zero chance of getting the law amended)
The law required integral locks . The intention was to have a near total ban on handgun sales . For a while Md dealers sought out NOS guns from distributors with mfg dates prior to the implementation, but that would have run dry after a while . The approval of Tampon locks as alternative allowed the retail gun biz to survive in Maryland.