MSP: FIREARM PURCHASE APPLICANTS WITH APPLICATIONS PENDING ON OCT 1 WON'T NEED HQL

fightinbluhen51 · Sep 24, 2013

Vassago said:
Delegatemike.com still has the MSP letter up on his site even though MSP site is down.

The original MSP Press Release from today, is also on this site in my locked thread. As well as the original scree grab on my work computer.

To AGC, I did not mean to step on your toes earlier as I forgot you guys cross post the press releases.

ShallNotInfringe · Sep 24, 2013

pilotguy299 said:
So now the MDSP have the authority to disregard the law?

Lawlessness. Plain and simple.

Rack&Roll · Sep 24, 2013

ShallNotInfringe said:
Lawlessness. Plain and simple.

Does this mean no Late Night Fruitcake for MSP, Madam NSI?

MJD438 · Sep 24, 2013

vgplayer said:
http://mgahouse.maryland.gov/House/...?catalog=03e481c7-8a42-4438-a7da-93ff74bdaa4c

Thanks.

Time hack for the discussion between Smigiel and MSP/AAG about the HQL and 01OCT: 19 minutes, very first question series. MSP admits at 19:56 that no one will be able to purchase or order a handgun on 01OCT.

TopShelf · Sep 24, 2013

Not_an_outlaw said:
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/politics/blog/bs-md-gun-update-20130924,0,4505989.story

It made the paper.

Hmm, story says ~ more than 40 state employees were enlisted to enter data. I saw the number 200 floating around somewhere. I guess technically 200 is greater than 40...

CrazySanMan · Sep 24, 2013

MSP: FIREARM PURCHASE APPLICANTS WITH APPLICATIONS PENDING ON OCT 1 WON'T NEE...

TopShelf said:
Hmm, story says ~ more than 40 state employees were enlisted to enter data. I saw the number 200 floating around somewhere. I guess technically 200 is greater than 40...

It also says

The department also deployed a new team of two dozen data-entry workers to help address the backlog, which has left gun purchasers waiting for months.

This worries me.

JPG · Sep 24, 2013

Do I hear Special Session to clean up mess? :lol2:

Lou45 · Sep 24, 2013

Deep Creek Rock said:
Anyone know why the MSP website is currently down? They hiding from Jesus or something?

Now dat's sum funny chit right dere, sum REAL funny chit!!!!!! :rofl:

Ranchero50 · Sep 24, 2013

Buying tomorrow, planned on getting the HQL, now I may end up with another before needing it.

This confusion and backpedaling is a good thing.

Not_an_outlaw · Sep 24, 2013

Web Page is up now, but I couldn't find anything on the approved HQL trainers as promised Monday. Also, no HQL application. We're 6 days away! Maybe I just can't find it.

Ellegon · Sep 24, 2013

Someone needs to tell MSP that the Keystone cops were from PA. ! ! ! !

jaybee · Sep 24, 2013

Ellegon said:
Someone needs to tell MSP that the Keystone cops were from PA. ! ! ! !

but the MSP does such a great job, in giving out Seat Belt Violation Tickets to help us protect us from ourselves

:innocent0

pilotguy299 · Sep 24, 2013

This is the MDSP's second decision of questionable legality this month.

Doesn't this support the claim that their opinion on an individual's G&S is suspect?

ShallNotInfringe · Sep 24, 2013

Ok, I was skeptical at first, but now I am actually considering one last purchase.

Dingo3 · Sep 25, 2013

pilotguy299 said:
This is the MDSP's second decision of questionable legality this month.

Doesn't this support the claim that their opinion on an individual's G&S is suspect?

Now this ^ is a very interesting point

Sorry, I don't mean to go off topic

CJWalker · Sep 25, 2013

Funny how the AG says one thing, and MSP says another lol. I sent an email to the LD a few months ago and I was told by the responding Trooper that I should be good to go without the HQL on pre-October 1st purchases received post October 1st. This was of course before the AG letter...

Tempted into buying MORE haha

JailHouseLiar · Sep 25, 2013

pilotguy299 said:
So now the MDSP have the authority to disregard the law?

That's not really new :innocent0

fidelity · Sep 25, 2013

Dingo3 said:
No this ^ is a very interesting point

Sorry, I don't mean to go off topic

You mean that actions by MD executive entities are arbitrary, not consistent with the law, and primarily focused on political expediency? Or when a state AG argues in court that open carry of long guns is not restricted, he should still be considered credible? They are digging a very big hole these days which has in part been precipitated by the rush to pass this incoherent legislative tripe.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dingo3 · Sep 25, 2013

fidelity said:
You mean that actions by MD executive entities are arbitrary, not consistent with the law, and primarily focused on political expediency? Or when a state AG argues in court that open carry of long guns is not restricted, he should still be considered credible? They are digging a very big hole these days which has in part been precipitated by the rush to pass this incoherent legislative tripe.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes to both. The inconsistencies are beyond believable. And I like your use of the word "tripe". Very fitting.

Jimbob2.0 · Sep 25, 2013

Wish I had known that earlier, might have affected a few decisions.

MSP: FIREARM PURCHASE APPLICANTS WITH APPLICATIONS PENDING ON OCT 1 WON'T NEED HQL

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

"Quack Pot Call Honker"

Lil Firecracker

R.I.P

Ultimate Member

@TopShelfJS

2013'er

Ultimate Member

R.I.P.

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Lil Firecracker

Ultimate Member

Active Member

Banned

piled higher and deeper

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Log in

Forum statistics