KSFrostie
Ultimate Member
I am looking in to getting a Taurus Raging Bull 500 or SW 500. I want to know if anyone has shot both of these firearms and could give me their impressions?
The S&W is better IMO. The muzzle break of the full-size SW500 is superior. I like the hand grips more, as well as the trigger and oversized cylinder release. I believe the finish to be more durable as well. Shooting something like Magtech loads through either isn't terrible. Shooting full-spec loads like ones by DT or others is still pretty unpleasant in both. The Raging Bull in .454 Casull is more enjoyable to shoot IMHO than the .500.
I believe the Raging Bull is no longer made in .500
I think the main problem with all this is going to be finding them at a reasonable price.
It depends about what your definition of reasonable is. You're dealing with a revolver that's expensive to buy, expensive to shoot, not terrible to reload (460 uses 45cal bullets which are plentiful but brass is more then other smaller magnums) and then if you want to scope it getting something that will handle the recoil between the scope, rings and base will set you back a good bit.
What about the BFR? I dont like porting on any pistols so I choose the BFR and have been nothing but happy. The price is usually better too.
Good luck with the Taurus.
So you have made a decision strictly on PRICE alone . HUM... I would re think it.
I have a taurus in 454 and have wished I had bought a ruger or s&w. If I had bigger hands, maybe I would have liked it more.