Go Back   Maryland Shooters > Gun Rights and Legislation > Maryland 2A Issues
Don't Have An Account? Register Here

Join MD Shooters

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old January 14th, 2019, 08:11 AM #11
platoonDaddy's Avatar
platoonDaddy platoonDaddy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: SouthOfBalto
Posts: 3,001
platoonDaddy platoonDaddy is offline
Senior Member
platoonDaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: SouthOfBalto
Posts: 3,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrimReaper View Post
Yep you're wrong. It could have been that way in the past but not anymore. I have a feeling that's going to change soon though

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
Thanks, located the following ruling in 2017

In a letter dated March 21, 2017, ATF reexamines its earlier position, which stated that shouldering a PSB-equipped firearm could constitute the making of an unregistered short-barreled rifle under the National Firearms Act (NFA). ATF now states:

“With respect to stabilizing braces, ATF has concluded that attaching the brace to a handgun as a forearm brace does not ‘make’ a short-barreled firearm because … it is not intended to be and cannot comfortably be fired from the shoulder.” The letter continues: “Therefore, an NFA firearm has not necessarily been made when the device is not re-configured for use as a shoulder stock — even if the attached firearm happens to be fired from the shoulder.”


http://soldiersystems.net/2017/04/26...lizing-braces/
platoonDaddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 14th, 2019, 08:43 AM #12
KevinK KevinK is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Carroll County, Md
Posts: 2,301
KevinK KevinK is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Carroll County, Md
Posts: 2,301
I'm guessing the Tac-13 requires an HQL, like the Shockwave.
KevinK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 14th, 2019, 09:01 AM #13
BossmanPJ's Avatar
BossmanPJ BossmanPJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,012
BossmanPJ BossmanPJ is offline
Senior Member
BossmanPJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinK View Post
I'm guessing the Tac-13 requires an HQL, like the Shockwave.
Yes it requires an HQL.
BossmanPJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 14th, 2019, 09:47 AM #14
Ammo Jon's Avatar
Ammo Jon Ammo Jon is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,259
Ammo Jon Ammo Jon is offline
Ammo Jon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinK View Post
I'm guessing the Tac-13 requires an HQL, like the Shockwave.
If I had to do it again I would get the Shockwave instead. Mainly because of the ergonomics/location of the action release on the 870. Then there is the cost of adding a +1 extension, a sling or grip to forearm of TAC, etc.
Ammo Jon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 15th, 2019, 08:07 PM #15
platoonDaddy's Avatar
platoonDaddy platoonDaddy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: SouthOfBalto
Posts: 3,001
platoonDaddy platoonDaddy is offline
Senior Member
platoonDaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: SouthOfBalto
Posts: 3,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ammo Jon View Post
If I had to do it again I would get the Shockwave instead. Mainly because of the ergonomics/location of the action release on the 870. Then there is the cost of adding a +1 extension, a sling or grip to forearm of TAC, etc.
The TAC-13 is 5+1 with hand strap.



Is it possible you are confusing the TAC-14 & TAC-13, or am I in left field?
platoonDaddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 15th, 2019, 08:11 PM #16
Ammo Jon's Avatar
Ammo Jon Ammo Jon is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,259
Ammo Jon Ammo Jon is offline
Ammo Jon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by platoonDaddy View Post
The TAC-13 is 5+1 with hand strap.



Is it possible you are confusing the TAC-14 & TAC-13, or am I in left field?
I completely missed that part I was referring to TAC 14. I haven’t kept up with them since, didn’t realize they even released a new one!
Ammo Jon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 15th, 2019, 08:30 PM #17
CrabcakesAndFootball's Avatar
CrabcakesAndFootball CrabcakesAndFootball is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Anne Arundel County
Posts: 405
CrabcakesAndFootball CrabcakesAndFootball is offline
Member
CrabcakesAndFootball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Anne Arundel County
Posts: 405
Quote:
Originally Posted by platoonDaddy View Post
The ATF really cleared up the differences.

Thanks
Lol. They buried the lede that these can’t be carried concealed. Need to re-evaluate my plans for 2019
CrabcakesAndFootball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 15th, 2019, 10:14 PM #18
platoonDaddy's Avatar
platoonDaddy platoonDaddy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: SouthOfBalto
Posts: 3,001
platoonDaddy platoonDaddy is offline
Senior Member
platoonDaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: SouthOfBalto
Posts: 3,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ammo Jon View Post
I completely missed that part I was referring to TAC 14. I haven’t kept up with them since, didn’t realize they even released a new one!

What I like about the TAC-13 is that it is a semi-auto
platoonDaddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 15th, 2019, 10:31 PM #19
DutchV DutchV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,529
DutchV DutchV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,529
The Mossberg Shockwave models are on the handgun roster but I don't see any entries for Remington. Are the approvals pending? Or will you have to submit a sample?
__________________
Making the bad man go away since 1982.
DutchV is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  Home Page > Forum List > Gun Rights and Legislation > Maryland 2A Issues


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2019, Congregate Media, LP Privacy Policy Terms of Service