Flash-hiders aren't getting any safer, so I'd say no
Yup, and it's the same 4th Circuit that ruled initially that strict scrutiny should be applied. Regardless of the outcome, this will seek cert with the USSC.The same circuit that, after the challenge to MD May Issue status in Wollard, and was ready to rule, but Newtown CN happened, decided that May Isssue was A-OK? That 4th Circuit?
The same circuit that, after the challenge to MD May Issue status in Wollard, and was ready to rule, but Newtown CN happened, decided that May Isssue was A-OK? That 4th Circuit?
So, viewing the graphic below, you know why they are working even harder to disarm the law-abiding ... as I shout from my soapbox.
Ain't it the truth.
Considering the context from which Madison and the framers produced the Second Amendment, it seems pretty clear that it's purpose could be boiled down into four words directed at the federal government:
We don't trust you!
Ain't it the truth.
Considering the context from which Madison and the framers produced the Second Amendment, it seems pretty clear that it's purpose could be boiled down into four words directed at the federal government:
We don't trust you!