Go Back   Maryland Shooters > Gun Rights and Legislation > National 2A Issues
Don't Have An Account? Register Here

Join MD Shooters

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old December 6th, 2017, 04:17 PM #1
swinokur's Avatar
swinokur swinokur is online now
In a State of Denial
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Gulag Montgomery
Posts: 42,171
swinokur swinokur is online now
In a State of Denial
swinokur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Gulag Montgomery
Posts: 42,171
S446 Senate National Reciprocity Act

Introduced by Senator Cornyn. I thought it deserves it's own thread as HR 38 was passed today

The Senate version differs from HR 38 in that it does require a home state permit for a resident of that state to carry in their home state
.
Attached Images
File Type: pdf BILLS-115s446is.pdf (260.4 KB, 344 views)
__________________

Last edited by swinokur; December 6th, 2017 at 05:40 PM.
swinokur is online now   Reply With Quote
Old December 6th, 2017, 04:40 PM #2
Schipperke Schipperke is offline
.
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 14,456
Schipperke Schipperke is offline
.
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 14,456
Quote:
Originally Posted by swinokur View Post
Introduced by Senator Cornyn. I thought it deserves it's own thread as HR 38 is being voted on today

The Senate version differs from HR 38 in that it does require a home state permit for a resident of that state to carry in their home state
.

That will be a lock if any chance at all..
Schipperke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 6th, 2017, 04:49 PM #3
JPG's Avatar
JPG JPG is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Calvert County
Posts: 3,828
JPG JPG is online now
Senior Member
JPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Calvert County
Posts: 3,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Schipperke View Post
That will be a lock if any chance at all..
I donít think so. There are several States that are constitutional carry so the way I see it there are a couple options:
1 those states will have to issue licenses
2 Senate will have to match House version so the Constitutional carry state citizens can get a non resident license to carry everywhere else in the US
JPG is online now   Reply With Quote
Old December 6th, 2017, 04:50 PM #4
Schipperke Schipperke is offline
.
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 14,456
Schipperke Schipperke is offline
.
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 14,456
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPG View Post
I donít think so. There are several States that are constitutional carry so the way I see it there are a couple options:
1 those states will have to issue licenses
2 Senate will have to match House version so the Constitutional carry state citizens can get a non resident license to carry everywhere else in the US
Why?
Schipperke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 6th, 2017, 04:51 PM #5
swinokur's Avatar
swinokur swinokur is online now
In a State of Denial
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Gulag Montgomery
Posts: 42,171
swinokur swinokur is online now
In a State of Denial
swinokur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Gulag Montgomery
Posts: 42,171
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPG View Post
I don’t think so. There are several States that are constitutional carry so the way I see it there are a couple options:
1 those states will have to issue licenses NO
2 Senate will have to match House version so the Constitutional carry state citizens can get a non resident license to carry everywhere else in the US
The Senate bill provides protection for residents of CC states, like HR 38 did. Residents of those states need only provide a photo ID in another state. No NR permit required

IANAL.
Attached Images
 
__________________
swinokur is online now   Reply With Quote
Old December 6th, 2017, 05:55 PM #6
esqappellate's Avatar
esqappellate esqappellate is offline
President, MSI
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 6,315
esqappellate esqappellate is offline
President, MSI
esqappellate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 6,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by swinokur View Post
The Senate bill provides protection for residents of CC states, like HR 38 did. Residents of those states need only provide a photo ID in another state. No NR permit required

IANAL.
It is less than clear (to me at least) that you have to have a CC permit from your home state. The operative language applies to a permit issued pursuant to the law of *a* state. Then limits its reach to cases where the handgun has been shipped in interstate commerce other than in the state of the residence. If the Colt is made in Conn. and is shipped to MD where is is purchased by a MD resident, that the interstate shipment requirement is satisfied. A NR permit is issued by ďaĒ state.
__________________
This may sound like legal advice, but it isn't. Don't rely on it. Hire your own counsel.
esqappellate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 6th, 2017, 06:06 PM #7
Allen65 Allen65 is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Anne Arundel County
Posts: 537
Allen65 Allen65 is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Anne Arundel County
Posts: 537
Quote:
Originally Posted by esqappellate View Post
It is less than clear (to me at least) that you have to have a CC permit from your home state. The operative language applies to a permit issued pursuant to the law of *a* state. Then limits its reach to cases where the handgun has been shipped in interstate commerce other than in the state of the residence. If the Colt is made in Conn. and is shipped to MD where is is purchased by a MD resident, that the interstate shipment requirement is satisfied. A NR permit is issued by ďaĒ state.
So MDers who own nothing but a Beretta 92FS aren't covered. Ugh.
Allen65 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old December 6th, 2017, 05:19 PM #8
mumfrey's Avatar
mumfrey mumfrey is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Northern Balt Co
Posts: 311
mumfrey mumfrey is offline
Member
mumfrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Northern Balt Co
Posts: 311
Quote:
Originally Posted by Schipperke View Post
That will be a lock if any chance at all..
Yup, the senate bill would leave us in the same position as we stand now, SOL.
mumfrey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 6th, 2017, 04:40 PM #9
ant92083's Avatar
ant92083 ant92083 is offline
Lord Of Summer
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: MD
Posts: 47
ant92083 ant92083 is offline
Lord Of Summer
ant92083's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: MD
Posts: 47
The Senate version needs to be reconciled with the house version. The Senate version leaves us hanging out to dry with the change.
__________________
SAILOR noun. [sey-lor] 1. AN ORGANIZED GROUP OF WARFIGHTING, BEER DRINKING, COUNTRY SERVING, HIGHLY TRAINED, SHARPLY DRESSED, ONE OF A KIND, DEFENDERS OF FREEDOM
ant92083 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 6th, 2017, 04:44 PM #10
swinokur's Avatar
swinokur swinokur is online now
In a State of Denial
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Gulag Montgomery
Posts: 42,171
swinokur swinokur is online now
In a State of Denial
swinokur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Gulag Montgomery
Posts: 42,171
HR 38 passed
__________________
swinokur is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

  Home Page > Forum List > Gun Rights and Legislation > National 2A Issues


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2018, Congregate Media, LP Privacy Policy Terms of Service