Cyber security bill SA 2575 includes magazine ban.

zoostation · Jul 27, 2012

Docster said:
What's amazing and encouraging to me is to see Schumer being so humble. Seems like he's off his high and mighty throne as if he senses that his policies and previous rantings havn't gotten very far. He's trying to soften his approach which is a sign of failure of previous approach(es). Let the 'reasonableness' begin........

I think you're spot on Doc!

The translation of a liberal saying "let's find some common ground" is "I don't have a bit of political strength to do something on this right now, so I'll lower myself to asking you to let me screw you over."

erwos · Jul 27, 2012

WeaponsCollector said:
If they ban magazines, the prices will more than triple overnight.
Then you can sell your extras and make a lot of money!
Pay $10-$15 for a magazine and then sell it for $75-$100.

This bans transfer... no more buying and selling prebans after the ban takes effect.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2

Eviljagtech · Jul 27, 2012

Maybe we should be checking the mental health of these people as they seem very dangerous and lacking in knowledge that there job requires.

jrumann59 · Jul 27, 2012

erwos said:
This bans transfer... no more buying and selling prebans after the ban takes effect.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2

No one knows how many I own now? or later if its FTF

oldman12 · Jul 28, 2012

Eviljagtech said:
Maybe we should be checking the mental health of these people as they seem very dangerous and lacking in knowledge that there job requires.

Got that right, along with Thier Constitutional values.

AliasNeo07 · Jul 28, 2012

It's been two days....any update on this?

E.Shell · Jul 28, 2012

DeadIDik said:
All kinds of spending amendments and laws are attached to bills all the time, this is far from the 1st time its happened.

Yup, I guess no one remembers Reagan signing the FOPA that had the '86 MG ban attached.

mbz300sdl · Jul 28, 2012

They can come for my mags but they will be empty when they get them.

zombiehunter · Jul 28, 2012

I love how they ask for "compromise". Compromise isn't "here's everything we want, but we'll only take half of it now". Isn't there some allegory using a cake that's applicable here? Like we used to have all of our cake, then they were like "you only need this much cake, here's NFA." Then later there's like "nah...you still have too much cake. Here's the GCA." Now they're fighting over scraps of our original cake

mayor_quimby · Jul 30, 2012

zombiehunter said:
I love how they ask for "compromise". Compromise isn't "here's everything we want, but we'll only take half of it now". Isn't there some allegory using a cake that's applicable here? Like we used to have all of our cake, then they were like "you only need this much cake, here's NFA." Then later there's like "nah...you still have too much cake. Here's the GCA." Now they're fighting over scraps of our original cake

That basically sounds like what it is...... but the thing that comes to mind too is everyone who complains about how Pro 2 A people will never sit down and have a rational discussion about "common sense" gun laws. You hear the Brady people/ VPC/ looney Democrats and so on complain about the NRA. Yet the same people who scream go head and try to pass arbitrary laws in without talking to anyone and yet no one seems to pick this up as to how two faced these people are.

ezracer · Jul 30, 2012

I'm getting Soo tired of these politicians doing whatever the H--L they want. Could the
general populace PLEASE get a chance to vote on this stuff.

It seems like all I do is write letters, send e-mails and call Congressman and Senators
about their stupid ideas.

A quote comes to mind. The late George Carlin once said, and I paraphrase,
"If voting was really important...they wouldn't let you do it".

Zombie_013 · Jul 30, 2012

I hate that condescending SOB.

foxtrapper · Jul 30, 2012

Eviljagtech said:
Maybe we should be checking the mental health of these people as they seem very dangerous and lacking in knowledge that there job requires.

All elected officials should undergo a brain scan to see if they have the "typical psychopathic brain pattern". It is pretty distinctive as shown in studies scanning the brains of convicted murderers and serial killers. If the elected officials have it, no more public office allowed for them.

swinokur · Jul 31, 2012

.....

[FONT=&quot]Gun Owners of America[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Anti-gun Lautenberg trying to[/FONT][FONT=&quot]
put amendment on Cybersecurity Bill[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Washington is, to say the least, not a town known for its high moral standards.[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]But there is, perhaps, no one with more expertise in milking shameless advantage out of national tragedy than ultra-liberal senators Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) and Chuck Schumer (D-NY).[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]So it can hardly be a surprise that, this week, these anti-gun Senators intend to offer an amendment to the cybersecurity bill which would prohibit the manufacture of magazines with a capacity of over 10 rounds.[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]They appear oblivious to the fact that their “gun ban” mentality created a deadly situation in Aurora, Colorado, where there was a room with a number of trained military marksmen -- and none of them were allowed to have a gun.[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Any one of those individuals could have made a big difference. Heck, does anyone doubt there would have been a different outcome if George Zimmerman had been in the theater?[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Incidentally, lest anyone think that banning magazines is the be-all-and-end-all for Lautenberg, he has already announced that he intends to follow up his magazine ban with legislation to monitor and limit your purchases of ammunition.[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Explains the clueless Lautenberg: “No sportsman needs 100 rounds to shoot a duck ….”[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]So this Einstein believes you don’t need 100 rounds of ammunition? Who decided that our Bill of Rights should be a “Bill of Needs”? [/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]It’s time to nip this nasty piece of work in the bud and ensure that his efforts to exploit innocent victims for political gain do not go any further.[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]ACTION[/FONT][FONT=&quot]: Click here to contact your Senators. Demand that they vote against the Lautenberg-Schumer magazine-ban amendment to the cybersecurity bill.

[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]

Cyber security bill SA 2575 includes magazine ban.

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

zoostation

, ,

erwos

The Hebrew Hammer

Eviljagtech

Infected w/ Freedom

jrumann59

DILLIGAF

oldman12

Ultimate Member

AliasNeo07

Ultimate Member

E.Shell

Ultimate Member

mbz300sdl

Gone living free now!!!

zombiehunter

Ultimate Member

mayor_quimby

4+4= Jello

ezracer

Certified Gun Nut

Zombie_013

Banned

foxtrapper

Ultimate Member

swinokur

In a State of Bliss

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Latest threads

Forum statistics

Share this page