Who to believe?

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • natsb

    Ultimate Member
    Sep 18, 2013
    1,281
    southern MD
    I am just getting started in reloading. I am at the stage where I have a bunch of Nosler 60gr Ballistic Tip Varmint bullets, trimmed and primed 223 cases, and a pound of Hodgdon Benchmark powder.

    So I go to the manuals and find the following load data:
    Hodgdon - start 23, max 24.6
    Lee - start 22, max 24.6
    Nosler - start 21.5, max 23.5

    Who is right? Is this where I toss a coin and hope for the best? I am especially concerned that the Nosler max is almost the same as the Hodgdon start.
     

    BigDaddy

    Ultimate Member
    Feb 7, 2014
    2,235
    I am just getting started in reloading. I am at the stage where I have a bunch of Nosler 60gr Ballistic Tip Varmint bullets, trimmed and primed 223 cases, and a pound of Hodgdon Benchmark powder.

    So I go to the manuals and find the following load data:
    Hodgdon - start 23, max 24.6
    Lee - start 22, max 24.6
    Nosler - start 21.5, max 23.5

    Who is right? Is this where I toss a coin and hope for the best? I am especially concerned that the Nosler max is almost the same as the Hodgdon start.

    My Lee 2nd edition, has 23g as the start for a 60g "jacketed bullet"
    Hodgon's online specifies a Hornady VMax
    And my Nosler manual is MIA, but I'll bet it specifies the Ballistic tip.

    Aside from them using different test rifles, the bullet is also a variable. While the VMax looks just like a BT, I do not know that it has the same bearing surface area nor the same jacket material, so I would go with Nosler's data.
     

    BradMacc82

    Ultimate Member
    Industry Partner
    Aug 17, 2011
    26,177
    Mid

    Sent from my GT-N8013 using Tapatalk

    You'll have plenty of room to work, safely. ;)

    I push 69gr Noslers out of a 16" Middy - 25.1gr of H335, no significant pressure signs. Loaded to magazine length. Wolf SRP.
     

    BradMacc82

    Ultimate Member
    Industry Partner
    Aug 17, 2011
    26,177
    I run 24.5 same bullet and powder ;-)

    I got lucky, that load ran just as well in my 24" Savage 10 as it did in my AR - the bolt was a bit tighter with the groups since the Middy ran a light-weight barrel.
     

    stu929

    M1 Addict
    Jan 2, 2012
    6,605
    Hagerstown
    I can tell you I noslers book. Its very limited on powder choices and in the reloading climate today its hard to find most of them.
     

    Uncle Duke

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Feb 2, 2013
    11,728
    Not Far Enough from the City
    Not at all a flip of a coin in my opinion.

    Where you have multiple choices for load data, I'd definitely start with the bullet manufacturer's data when you have it available. Where bullet weights can be identical across different manufacturers, bearing surfaces and bullet design characteristics can and do differ. To me anyway, the bullet manufacturer is specifying their suggested load data for THEIR specified bullet. Take their word for it as your best source of the 3 sources, start with their suggested starting load, and slowly and very gradually work your way up while being alert for pressure signs in YOUR rifle.
     

    j8064

    Garrett Co Hooligan #1
    Feb 23, 2008
    11,635
    Deep Creek
    I would use the bullet manufactures information.

    This ^^^

    Not at all a flip of a coin in my opinion.

    Where you have multiple choices for load data, I'd definitely start with the bullet manufacturer's data when you have it available. Where bullet weights can be identical across different manufacturers, bearing surfaces and bullet design characteristics can and do differ. To me anyway, the bullet manufacturer is specifying their suggested load data for THEIR specified bullet. Take their word for it as your best source of the 3 sources, start with their suggested starting load, and slowly and very gradually work your way up while being alert for pressure signs in YOUR rifle.

    And this ^^^

    Just as bullets and powders are different, firearms are different. No bullet or powder manufacturer ever tests their published loads in your firearm.
     

    DaemonAssassin

    Why should we Free BSD?
    Jun 14, 2012
    24,000
    Political refugee in WV
    The "sticky" threads cover where you should get you load data. If you are using Sierra bullets, use the Sierra reloading book to get the correct information. Use Nosler's reloading book for Nosler's bullets.
     

    Blacksmith101

    Grumpy Old Man
    Jun 22, 2012
    22,288
    There are other variables beside bullet and powder.

    The case (manufacturer and capacity) and the primer mainly.

    Which is why you always start low and work your way up.

    Lighter loads cost less (more reloads per pound of powder) and beat up your gun less. More is not always better and the trade off of a few FPS is seldom worth it, the hole in the paper doesn't care.
     

    outrider58

    Eats Bacon Raw
    MDS Supporter
    Jul 29, 2014
    50,043
    The "sticky" threads cover where you should get you load data. If you are using Sierra bullets, use the Sierra reloading book to get the correct information. Use Nosler's reloading book for Nosler's bullets.

    I tend to go with powder specs because bullet specs don't always cover the powder I'm using. In doing so, if I can't find my bullet in the powder's specs, I find a bullet of similar length and weight and adjust accordingly working my way up. I tend to load a lot of 68-69 gr. 224 bullets so it's not a lot of math to arrive at a safe starting point.
     

    DaemonAssassin

    Why should we Free BSD?
    Jun 14, 2012
    24,000
    Political refugee in WV
    I tend to go with powder specs because bullet specs don't always cover the powder I'm using. In doing so, if I can't find my bullet in the powder's specs, I find a bullet of similar length and weight and adjust accordingly working my way up. I tend to load a lot of 68-69 gr. 224 bullets so it's not a lot of math to arrive at a safe starting point.

    For an experienced reloader that is fine, but the OP said he was new to reloading. He is also asking which information to use for his loads. Recommending him to use the manufacturer books is the safest thing for him to do.
     

    outrider58

    Eats Bacon Raw
    MDS Supporter
    Jul 29, 2014
    50,043
    I am relatively new to reloading also but I have taken some classes. It can be frustrating sometimes with the scarcity of reloading materials, having to resort to using in some cases, new or no-mainstream powders, bullets, primers etc. Not saying to be careless. On the contrary, to be extra careful. And as always, if unsure, always ask someone.
     

    sgt23preston

    USMC LLA. NRA Life Member
    May 19, 2011
    4,008
    Perry Hall
    Given only the information that you presented, if it was me, I'd load 23 grains = Mathematical Mid Point of all 6 loads...

    Hodgdon - start 23, max 24.6
    Lee - start 22, max 24.6
    Nosler - start 21.5, max 23.5

    It was on the safe side of all 3 load ranges...
     

    jjones88

    Active Member
    Apr 4, 2013
    568
    Sykesville
    I am just getting started in reloading. I am at the stage where I have a bunch of Nosler 60gr Ballistic Tip Varmint bullets, trimmed and primed 223 cases, and a pound of Hodgdon Benchmark powder.

    So I go to the manuals and find the following load data:
    Hodgdon - start 23, max 24.6
    Lee - start 22, max 24.6
    Nosler - start 21.5, max 23.5

    Who is right? Is this where I toss a coin and hope for the best? I am especially concerned that the Nosler max is almost the same as the Hodgdon start.

    Did you check COL? Guessing Nosler has their BT seated a lot shorter then the others....

    Ran into a similar issue with N133 and when i was trying to find a start point, suddenly realized that Hodgdon had the bullet seated deeper then the other two. Makes figuring out a starting point a little harder but if you know you plan to seat longer (Those V-max's for me like around 2.245-2.250) then you are a little safer on the max if you crest 24 gr (as always watch for pressure signs, I'd probably start looking around 23.9 - 24.0)

    When you are bouncing from data sources keep that COL as one of the first things to check
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,552
    Messages
    7,286,150
    Members
    33,476
    Latest member
    Spb5205

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom