Sheriff, “They’ll Have To Take My Guns Before They Get Yours”

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!

    • Register Log in
    Mr H

    Mr H

    Banana'd
    Mar 9, 2010
    135,961
    PRM, Province AA, District 32, GBP Zone
    5cary said:
    I'm not buying it. He also said

    So if it's "ordained" at some point in the near or far future that 2A only applies to membership in the National Guard, then would that signify a "constitutional change" that he would then enforce? Maybe I'm reading it wrong, but I'm not getting warm fuzzies on this guy's belief in armed citizenry.

    Sounds like condescension to me.
    Click to expand...

    http://www.mywoodcounty.com/default.aspx?name=countysheriff
     
    Brooklyn

    Brooklyn

    I stand with John Locke.
    Jan 20, 2013
    13,095
    Plan D? Not worth the hassle.
    stu929 said:
    Watch... within the next year the gov will crawl up his @$$ and he will be accused of some wrong doing and be fired.
    Click to expand...

    Sheriffs are elected. So are Governors. Governors that trump up charges on other elected officials may be fired.

    Stop bellyaching and pledge to defend the Sheriffs that defend us.

    I so pledge.
     
    Brooklyn

    Brooklyn

    I stand with John Locke.
    Jan 20, 2013
    13,095
    Plan D? Not worth the hassle.
    5cary said:
    I'm not buying it. He also said

    So if it's "ordained" at some point in the near or far future that 2A only applies to membership in the National Guard, then would that signify a "constitutional change" that he would then enforce? Maybe I'm reading it wrong, but I'm not getting warm fuzzies on this guy's belief in armed citizenry.

    Sounds like condescension to me.
    Click to expand...

    Really... you win.. happy now?
     
    S

    Sourkraut115

    Active Member
    Jul 6, 2013
    881
    the Westside
    T'Challa said:
    Name one Sheriff in Balto County, Harford, Balto City, P.G., Montgomery, A.A. counties that would do the same?
    Click to expand...

    Of course, with the exception of Harford County, you just named the MD jurisdictions where the Sheriff basically functions as an administrative agent of the court, rather than having a general law enforcement role.
     
    S

    Sourkraut115

    Active Member
    Jul 6, 2013
    881
    the Westside
    5cary said:
    I'm not buying it. He also said

    So if it's "ordained" at some point in the near or far future that 2A only applies to membership in the National Guard, then would that signify a "constitutional change" that he would then enforce? Maybe I'm reading it wrong, but I'm not getting warm fuzzies on this guy's belief in armed citizenry.

    Sounds like condescension to me.
    Click to expand...

    I would tend to interpret "constitutional change" as an actual change in the Constitution by the process defined within the Constitution, i.e., amendment. Although personally I would regard removing all or part of the Bill of Rights as tantamount to dissolving the Union by massive breach of contract, it would be technically possible, and Constitutional, to do so, if such an amendment were passed. I would agree that this sheriff, although he appears committed to the law and intent of the Founders, seems to have decided along the way that if the Constitution were altered in such a way, he would be willing to support that revised document. I would not, myself, feel beholden to that.
     
    Vile Shadow

    Vile Shadow

    ...
    Feb 28, 2013
    28,953
    stu929 said:
    Watch... within the next year the gov will crawl up his @$$ and he will be accused of some wrong doing and be fired.
    Click to expand...

    When he was in 7th grade he smoked pot once. :rolleyes:

    Dogabutila said:
    So basically 'they' don't have to come for the guns. They just make doing anything with them illegal, and he will come arrest you FOR them.
    Click to expand...

    No that isn't what he said.

    mr h said:
    http://cspoa.org/sheriffs-gun-rights/

    Only 6 in MD have signed on...

    Carroll... Ken Tregoning
    Frederick... Charles A. Jenkins
    Garrett... Robert E. Corley
    Kent... John Price
    St. Mary's... Timothy Cameron
    Wicomico... Mike Lewis
    Click to expand...

    Infantry23 said:
    Why TF is Washington and Allegany not on the list making 8?!
    Click to expand...

    I was wondering that myself. And only one on the eastern shore?

    5cary said:
    It is now illegal to purchase an AR-15 in MD. That's OK by you as well?
    Click to expand...

    No it isn't. These are legal.

    http://clydearmory.com/bushmaster-a3-11-5-barrel-5-5-mizzle-break-5-56mm.html

    http://clydearmory.com/colt-ar6721.html
     
    jrumann59

    jrumann59

    DILLIGAF
    MDS Supporter
    Feb 17, 2011
    14,024
    whats is the requirements to be elected Sheriff in a county in MD. The MD Constitution only has age requirements. I would really like to get rid of Bane in Harford.
     
    FrankZ

    FrankZ

    Liberty = Responsibility
    MDS Supporter
    Oct 25, 2012
    3,354
    jrumann59 said:
    whats is the requirements to be elected Sheriff in a county in MD. The MD Constitution only has age requirements. I would really like to get rid of Bane in Harford.
    Click to expand...


    It looks like you need to be 25 and be a resident of the county for 5 years.

    And do the other stuff, financial statements and such.
     
    T'Challa

    T'Challa

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Apr 24, 2013
    2,179
    Wakanda
    Sourkraut115 said:
    Of course, with the exception of Harford County, you just named the MD jurisdictions where the Sheriff basically functions as an administrative agent of the court, rather than having a general law enforcement role.
    Click to expand...

    True, but the office of Sheriff is a constitutional law enforcement officer. Name me five across the state that would take such a stand.
     
    You must log in or register to reply here.

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
    1A Fingerprinting services

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,396
    Messages
    7,279,980
    Members
    33,445
    Latest member
    ESM07

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom