smores
Creepy-Ass Cracker
I know that UZI pistols are banned in MD (I guess that means the Micro UZI). Are the UZI Carbine or Mini UZI legal here in MD? Or are they all unobtainable?
I know the uzi with the extended front barrel is legal in MD. It's basically just an Uzi pistol with a longer barrel. If you were unconcerned about the law, you could simply cut the barrel back down.
I know that UZI pistols are banned in MD (I guess that means the Micro UZI). Are the UZI Carbine or Mini UZI legal here in MD? Or are they all unobtainable?
Novus, could you buy that uzi carbine and then either legally swap out a shorter barrel or have it cut down? Are you saying you submit the weapon for inspection at some govt agency and pay for a tax stamp to legalize it? Can you explain this process and how much it costs? Thanks...
Also, does anyone have any feedback on the accuracy and reliability of the uzi carbines? I know its range is very limited and it isn't intended to be a target shooter, but as far as 9mm/45 carbines are concerned how does it stack up against similar weapons?
Yes and possibly no. There was a Supreme Court case about the Thompson Centerfire pistol/rifle possesion. A man was charged because since the same frame could be used with a combination of parts of a short barrel while keeping the buttstock on it it constituted a SBR under the NFA definition and how the ATF understood it.I'm thinking I probably know the answer to this, but if I have the Uzi rifle (long barrel), can I legally posses the short barrel as long as it isn't attached to the firearm?
On June 8, 1992, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Contender pistol and carbine kit are not a short-barreled rifle under the National Firearms Act, 26 U.S.C. §5845(a)(3). This means that a consumer may possess the pistol with its 10" barrel and may use the kit parts to make a rifle with the 21" barrel, as long as the shoulder stock is not assembled onto the receiver at the same time as the 10" barrel.
Justice Souter, joined by Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justice O'Connor, wrote the opinion of the Court. The Court stated the issue to be whether a short-barreled rifle is "made" by the aggregation of finished parts that can be readily assembled.
The government noted that a bicycle is still a bicycle even when unassembled. The Court rejects this analogy, because the Contender items can be assembled three different ways, and are intended to be assembled only two ways.
Justice Souter wrote that "a set of parts that could be used to make nothing but a short-barreled rifle" would, if there is an "aggregation" of such, be a short-barreled rifle. The opinion states that "a combination of parts that could only be assembled into an NFA-regulated firearm" would be such a firearm.[1] Further, a non-NFA gun becomes an NFA firearm if "placed together with a further part or parts that would have no use in association with the gun except to convert it into a firearm." As examples, the court mentions a carbine with a machinegun conversion kit,[2] and a pistol and attachable shoulder stock found in different drawers of the same dresser.
Like the rest of our multitude of firearms laws - the answer is buried by a bureaucracy. Thanks.