Why is Maryland so anti-gun?

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • JettaRed

    Ultimate Member
    Mar 13, 2013
    1,138
    Middletown
    Maryland is, to a large extent, a matrix of people:
    - dependent or reliant on government for protection and/or sustinence.
    - raised in gentrified subcultures to whom self-reliance and independence is a foreign concept.
    - indoctrinated from childhood to believe that subservience to government authority is natural.
    - who work within the government/contractor complex and thus subject to the paradigm that people outside government need to be 'governed', rather than served.

    I agree with everything but your last point. That's utter ********! Those of us working in the government are no different than the general population--we are not politicians. It's certain politicians that are the problem.

    Watch Innocents Betrayed, if you haven't already.

    http://youtu.be/NN0vkSO9n8Y
     

    Benanov

    PM Bomber
    May 15, 2013
    910
    Shrewsbury, PA
    Nothing in Maryland history like the civil war, the Klan, or the king riots could ever suggest such a thing. I am shocked and disappoited that years of whitewash have not put such evil rumors to rest.

    Sadly, no amount of whitewashing will hide that amount of blood on the walls.

    Liberal post-racialism might have a chance, though.
     

    jonnyl

    Ultimate Member
    Sep 23, 2009
    5,969
    Frederick
    Small size overall state with all of Baltimore and a large portion of the DC suburbs. Large cities tend to be more liberal/anti gun. There aren't enough of us to balance that (or enough who pay attention and actually vote).
     

    Brooklyn

    I stand with John Locke.
    Jan 20, 2013
    13,095
    Plan D? Not worth the hassle.
    Sadly, no amount of whitewashing will hide that amount of blood on the walls.

    Liberal post-racialism might have a chance, though.

    Either you missed my sarcasim or I missed yours. A look at voting records suggest that the whitewash has worked..

    It was not the solid Democratic south that led the charge. And Lincoln was the first Rebubilcan. Today the D party is know for it minority friendly views and yet not one of their policies has helped minorities. Say what you will about the modern Republican party ( and you will truth notwithstanding) the party of Lincoln actually helped minorities at least then. Nor can one discount the role of Democrats from the south opposing the civil rights act.

    So no whitewash works just fine... the question is why.
     

    deesly1

    Active Member
    Nov 16, 2011
    412
    Okay! before I get the, living in the past rhetoric, hear me completely out. The Black american family has been destroyed from this countries inception. ( I am not saying this is an excuse for behavior but it is the reason) The inner cities of America are the way they are due to institutional racism. During Jim Crow which, existed in every sourthen state in this country, including Maryland, the Black family was intact. Once the civil rights hit in the late 1950's and 1960's, the black family structure was intact. In the early 70's the Black family in the city was escaping to the suburbs and growing. Drugs in the form of Herion were allowed to infiltrate the inner city,along with unemployement, destroyed the black family. Now what you see are the fruits of that labor. I say this as an explaination not to point fingers or blame. However this problem will get worse and because we live in the same nation it will spread. So unless the cancer is fixed it will infiltrate future generations. So as they take all rights away for the fear of the black man every one's rights will get caught up in the wash. It is about control and the focus on controlling the masses by dangling the fear of the big black (Latino, Arhab) criminial.

    Oh an excuse my spelling!
     

    KMK1862

    Ultimate Member
    Oct 12, 2010
    2,046
    York County, PA
    Because of the demographics and votes. Generally, usually, normally, blue=anti-2A stance. To be fair, there are some pro 2A blue folks.

    Generally, usually, normally, red=pro 2A stance.

    Look at a map of Maryland during the last election, or the one before that, and the one prior to that one. If MD's blue was any darker, we'd be black.

    It's a more or less a one party state, run sadly, by the blue party.
     

    deesly1

    Active Member
    Nov 16, 2011
    412
    Because of the demographics and votes. Generally, usually, normally, blue=anti-2A stance. To be fair, there are some pro 2A blue folks.

    Generally, usually, normally, red=pro 2A stance.

    Look at a map of Maryland during the last election, or the one before that, and the one prior to that one. If MD's blue was any darker, we'd be black.

    It's a more or less a one party state, run sadly, by the blue party.

    I agree:thumbsup:
     

    Brooklyn

    I stand with John Locke.
    Jan 20, 2013
    13,095
    Plan D? Not worth the hassle.
    Okay! before I get the, living in the past rhetoric, hear me completely out. The Black american family has been destroyed from this countries inception. ( I am not saying this is an excuse for behavior but it is the reason) The inner cities of America are the way they are due to institutional racism. During Jim Crow which, existed in every sourthen state in this country, including Maryland, the Black family was intact. Once the civil rights hit in the late 1950's and 1960's, the black family structure was intact. In the early 70's the Black family in the city was escaping to the suburbs and growing. Drugs in the form of Herion were allowed to infiltrate the inner city,along with unemployement, destroyed the black family. Now what you see are the fruits of that labor. I say this as an explaination not to point fingers or blame. However this problem will get worse and because we live in the same nation it will spread. So unless the cancer is fixed it will infiltrate future generations. So as they take all rights away for the fear of the black man every one's rights will get caught up in the wash. It is about control and the focus on controlling the masses by dangling the fear of the big black (Latino, Arhab) criminial.

    Oh an excuse my spelling!


    There is evidence that the black family was stronger during Jim Crow than after the effects of Johnsons war on poverty. I make no causal claim... I have no idea...

    But it is both tragic and hard to explain..

    Much work has been done on this, but much has been surpressed as well. The black community is going to have to ask of itself some hard questions. The rest of us can only stand and watch and if asked we can help.... but this must be done by the community itself. These answers are not ours to give. We hold no secret.. no cure....

    Blame may make you feel better....but it will solve nothing... I hope the community starts to ask the hard questions. I will help if I can and if asked... but its not my place to play ( pardon the experesion) white knight.

    I belive the black community is strong enough to right itself and built a strong base-- even save Baltimore.. what I do not know is when they will start and if it will be in time...
     

    Bob A

    όυ φροντισ
    MDS Supporter
    Patriot Picket
    Nov 11, 2009
    30,968
    Training.

    My granddaughter is taking a course in Criminal Justice at MC. The instructor, ex-LEO, asked the class how many would be dismayed if he came to class open carrying. More than half the hands shot up.

    So he asks why?

    "I'd be afraid you'd snap and start shooting up the classroom" was a typical response. He responds that he's carried a firearm for decades as a LEO; would they not assume he's not a threat?

    Apparently not.

    Please note that they have been conditioned into a state of fear of firearms.

    Now, my oldest daughter attended Blair HS in her youth; they had a rifle team on site. Presumably they were taught firearm safety. She is not terrified at the thought of guns.

    So, I say again; it's training. Kids have been trained to fear these things, and emphatically NOT trained in safety procedures. Eddie Eagle training could be provided free to every middle and high school in the state, but this is not desired; someone in charge likes the fear. Or else, someone in charge is also scared.

    I dislike having children taught by frightened ignoramuses; I dislike even more having to over-pay for it through my tax bill.

    It's not race; it's fear and stupidity that are the problems.
     

    Doctor_M

    Certified Mad Scientist
    MDS Supporter
    Maryland is, to a large extent, a matrix of people:
    - dependent or reliant on government for protection and/or sustinence.
    - raised in gentrified subcultures to whom self-reliance and independence is a foreign concept.
    - indoctrinated from childhood to believe that subservience to government authority is natural.
    - who work within the government/contractor complex and thus subject to the paradigm that people outside government need to be 'governed', rather than served.

    This... plus highly urban. PA, VA, WVA are all much more rural in nature.
     

    mrdave2010

    Member
    Aug 8, 2011
    60
    Maryland
    Do you think there was less outrage over all the anti gun stuff, specifically the need for that stupid hand gun license, because it didn't f over active military??? I think these twisted politicians knew that unless they had a "military needs an id as a license(HQL)" they would get outrage from the significant portion of md population that is military. I feel like they are easing in stricter and stricter policies and people are sleeping as it happens, and the people that are generally pretty active about not getting f'ed over were accommodated in order to prevent mass opposition. I say this as a guy that is active, I'm just outraged that other shooters I work with consider it not an issue since their id works.
     

    babalou

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Aug 12, 2013
    16,167
    Glenelg
    I agree with everything but your last point. That's utter ********! Those of us working in the government are no different than the general population--we are not politicians. It's certain politicians that are the problem.

    Watch Innocents Betrayed, if you haven't already.

    http://youtu.be/NN0vkSO9n8Y

    Most Gubbment workers I know are corporatists just like Maobama. All they look at is their damn GS sheets and getting stuff from us. They do not want Gubbment to shrink and to get a job where performance is key, not getting a raise based on lowest common denominator since raises are not based on performance. Most new jobs in the jobs reports are with the gubbment. I have a cousin that works for an agency off 123 in VA- not an agent. Typical liberal. Why do you think VA went blue? Northern VA. Just like MD- most of MD is red. Since they got rid of the one senator from each county representation, we have been screwed.
     

    WeaponsCollector

    EXTREME GUN OWNER
    Mar 30, 2009
    12,120
    Southern MD
    I think much of Maryland's senseless gun laws exist thanks to urban areas like PG county, Baltimore, etc. with dense populations and high levels of crime thanks to gangs and "thug culture" fueled by the war on drugs.
     

    Docster

    Ultimate Member
    Jul 19, 2010
    9,775
    Training.

    My granddaughter is taking a course in Criminal Justice at MC. The instructor, ex-LEO, asked the class how many would be dismayed if he came to class open carrying. More than half the hands shot up.

    So he asks why?

    "I'd be afraid you'd snap and start shooting up the classroom" was a typical response. He responds that he's carried a firearm for decades as a LEO; would they not assume he's not a threat?

    Apparently not.

    Please note that they have been conditioned into a state of fear of firearms.

    Now, my oldest daughter attended Blair HS in her youth; they had a rifle team on site. Presumably they were taught firearm safety. She is not terrified at the thought of guns.

    So, I say again; it's training. Kids have been trained to fear these things, and emphatically NOT trained in safety procedures. Eddie Eagle training could be provided free to every middle and high school in the state, but this is not desired; someone in charge likes the fear. Or else, someone in charge is also scared.

    I dislike having children taught by frightened ignoramuses; I dislike even more having to over-pay for it through my tax bill.

    It's not race; it's fear and stupidity that are the problems.

    That's not so much training as it is socialization. People don't have to be trained to be comfortable letting others handle weapons or be around weapons. Hoplophobia is a learned behavior. Those who grow up around guns don't fear them nearly as much as those that haven't and have to learn about guns through TV and Hollywood.
     

    tdt91

    I will miss you my friend
    Apr 24, 2009
    10,812
    Abingdon
    Geographically MD is more conservative than not. The problem lies in the cities like many others. The population is so large in PG Co. Mont Co. and balto city that the rest of the voting public is voiceless.
    MD is so dependant on Fed gov employee's, get it yet. If the Federal stuff wasn't here right now this state would be done and over with
    My wife grew up here and when she was in school getting close to the young age of 18 the government teacher told the class that they should all register as Democrates when they turn 18. Now you take a kid that has parents that don't vote ( like most people ) and never talk about politics they are going to do what that teacher says. They don't know any better. She did register but never voted. Then I got a hold of her a straighted things out.

    They old democrate party that was really for the people are no more. I don't really have any confidence in the rebublicans but thats all we really have. Some say go Libitairian but all that does is help the dems. Yeah I know you libitairians hate hearing it but it's true.
     

    tball

    Ultimate Member
    May 20, 2010
    2,135
    St. Augustine, Florida
    If a city has a high crime and murder rate; instead of doing something about the crime, it is easier to blame guns. It is easier to go after law abiding citizens than it is to go after criminals. They arrest criminals, then either can't convict them or let them plead to a lesser crime and they get out early. Someone who has a criminal record cannot hope to get a job, so they continue to commit crimes. If you can't keep drugs out of the hands of criminals, you won't keep guns out of the hands of criminals. Now they are talking about legalizing drugs, maybe they should consider legalizing guns! It has already been proven that more guns leads to less crime. Don't mess with old people. That little old lady is probably packing.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,539
    Messages
    7,285,583
    Members
    33,475
    Latest member
    LikeThatHendrix

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom