Personally, I've always wanted to spend $550 on a stripped lower. lol
http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.asp?Item=110557994
http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.asp?Item=110557994
Is this a realistic price?
- Thread starter haoleboy
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
I'm confused... I'm supposed to pay 5 times what it's worth because it LOOKS like a transferable auto reciever?! Not to mention it's made by Olympic who is rather well known for their shitty quality...
I'd rather buy a Larue Tactical lower then that damn thing... And you'd have to hold a gun to my head to get me to even consider supporting Larue....
I'd rather buy a Larue Tactical lower then that damn thing... And you'd have to hold a gun to my head to get me to even consider supporting Larue....
Adams74Chevy
Hits broadsides of barns
I guess some of the cost for the stripping the old anodization of and the new anodization? Still, too much IMHO.
JeepDriver
Self confessed gun snob
I guess if you live in a ban state like Mass or NY it may be worth it to you. But in non-ban sates it's rape.
leroygibbs
Ultimate Member
- Jan 2, 2008
- 3,285
you know, it comes with a free quart of motor oil and a jar of vaseline....
E.Shell
Ultimate Member
What a bunch of crap. . . 
That receiver is no closer to an M-16 receiver ("transferable" or not) than ANY commercial AR-15.
Then, even though it's not, "so what" if it was? It's still not convertible since Reagan signed the '86 MG ban and the closer it is to being an illegal MG, the closer one is to having legal problems over possession of it.
It has the high shelf in the back of the fire control pocket (preventing a full auto FCG installation) and there is no sear pin bore. Other than noting that view of the M-16 lower was omitted from the comparison pics, the shelf doesn't matter, but a sear pin bore in an AR-15 is a trip to Club Fed.
In short, it's no different than any AR-15 lower out there, and maybe not as good as most of modern manufacture.
FWIW, anodizing is easily stripped with a caustic soda (sodium hydroxide (lye)) solution. Having a credit toward anodizing is no big deal unless one wanted a custom color, but for the $450 too much money he wants for it, you could have it gold-plated.
That receiver is no closer to an M-16 receiver ("transferable" or not) than ANY commercial AR-15.
Then, even though it's not, "so what" if it was? It's still not convertible since Reagan signed the '86 MG ban and the closer it is to being an illegal MG, the closer one is to having legal problems over possession of it.
It has the high shelf in the back of the fire control pocket (preventing a full auto FCG installation) and there is no sear pin bore. Other than noting that view of the M-16 lower was omitted from the comparison pics, the shelf doesn't matter, but a sear pin bore in an AR-15 is a trip to Club Fed.
In short, it's no different than any AR-15 lower out there, and maybe not as good as most of modern manufacture.
FWIW, anodizing is easily stripped with a caustic soda (sodium hydroxide (lye)) solution. Having a credit toward anodizing is no big deal unless one wanted a custom color, but for the $450 too much money he wants for it, you could have it gold-plated.
Users who are viewing this thread
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
PG County getting some Liberty Doll love over a bill that would ban computers for minors (1 Viewer)- Started by jc1240
- Replies: 6