clandestine
AR-15 Savant
Dumais got a few girlfriends to post some praise, please help set the record straight
Probably one of OMalleys "girlfriends"
Dumais got a few girlfriends to post some praise, please help set the record straight
Because it supports obama's agenda on illegals and is in keeping with the party line for the 16 presidency would be my guess.
Because you can use it as a voter id.
Voted for it!? Hell she drove it through. Co-chaired the House committee, cosponsored the bill. The woman is pure evil. Lies drip off her lips with so much ease that I don't think she even knows when she is speaking the truth or BS.
Which burns my ass to no end. What the f is the reasoning for this???????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Also it is not at all clear that Alamo will be effective in liberal havens. Even if it is they may replace funding faster than we can peel it off. Think Bloomberg.
Shes a Family Law Attorney. What do you expect?
I have yet to meet one that has more integrity than a turd. They are worse than Criminal Defense Attorneys.
Spot on. I've lived in this liberal cesspool my whole life. You're not gonna change any minds here. They are too entrenched in their liberal thinking. More effective efforts should be expended elsewhere. This county is a lost cause and I'm not a pessimist. Just that we can accomplish more in other counties with politicians whose minds could be changed.
Frosh, Dumais, Frick, Lee et all will never change their positions no matter how much we try. Let's work elsewhere.
My .02 which ain't much.
Voted for it!? Hell she drove it through. Co-chaired the House committee, cosponsored the bill. The woman is pure evil. Lies drip off her lips with so much ease that I don't think she even knows when she is speaking the truth or BS.
she voted for it, therefor she voted against us.
Exactly
To be honest, despite the voices against the ban, I do listen to my constituents and the majority of them want these banned. If you look at the local polling, the national polling, I think that’s where the country is at this time ... and we may have to evolve. One of the things I think we might consider in the future is about competitive shooting … let some of this dust settle, come back next January.
Additionally, she also tried to kick people out of the committee hearing.
+1
For her to claim to have "struggled" with parts of the bill is not very believable. She was a very outspoken supporter! She fabricated facts, like "high mag" revolver, when speaking in support of the bill during the senate proceedings. See this thread for when that happened:
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=114041&page=69
My comment:
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?p=2311447#post2311447
For God's sakes, she was the floor leader for the bill and was utterly uncompromising. For her to claim anything less, is unconscionable.
*** Why do MD Criminal Defense Attorneys write and/or vote on MD Criminal Laws? ***
If that is true, than it's indeed a lost cause. IMO if we don't get rid of the stronger leadership positions (at least 1 or 2), then their influence and power will continue to corrupt the freshmen. So, while we may get some change in seats, we end up with the same results.
My .02 which is worth even less.
We must be realistic. Peel off weak incumbents. Pull the majority below 2/3. That might be possible. You will not unseat the leadership without weakening the machine first.
If you expect anything more in only one election cycle you are dreaming.
We must be realistic. Peel off weak incumbents. Pull the majority below 2/3. That might be possible. You will not unseat the leadership without weakening the machine first.
If you expect anything more in only one election cycle you are dreaming.
Which burns my ass to no end. What the f is the reasoning for this???????????????????????????????????????????????????????
And you know that 'cause...?