Duncan v Berrcerra

CurlyDave · Jul 16, 2019

Well, I tried to read the brief, but it drove my blood pressure to unsafe levels.

wolfwood · Jul 24, 2019

amicus briefs filed

https://www.scribd.com/document/419...w-xtX_hky5iotF3ElmyY3zOVEXUoF4JS9p-m99wz29PT4

https://www.scribd.com/document/419...rk3rNsogcAsrVl6xKk-jvMuklEsRAXvbGn8wOxIu-YLoQ

https://www.scribd.com/document/419...mcEgmT1LXeVsH9K4b-0aVdWoN5cwATgKUXbsyqii_Ax1Q

https://www.scribd.com/document/419...MOsck-qhLJ-oZpf7xzT2mM9U5jBebU_m1r5AlijTHSvz8

https://www.scribd.com/document/419...VDiPpLoF6BAf4q2YCOiXbyk86Jh25H-Jo74-f232XS5HI

https://www.scribd.com/document/419...rk3rNsogcAsrVl6xKk-jvMuklEsRAXvbGn8wOxIu-YLoQ

HaveBlue · Jul 24, 2019

Thanks for posting!

That is a lot of digital ink over a plastic box and a spring.

jcutonilli · Sep 16, 2019

Answer brief filed. Clement is council of record for the case now.

Occam · Sep 17, 2019

What's the timetable/roadmap on this? Obviously hoping for a win that sets up a solid split with the 4th, and realize that in turn would be a long wait for SCOTUS. But what's the timetable for the people in the 9th?

esqappellate · Sep 17, 2019

Occam said:
What's the timetable/roadmap on this? Obviously hoping for a win that sets up a solid split with the 4th, and realize that in turn would be a long wait for SCOTUS. But what's the timetable for the people in the 9th?

SLOW. Based on my experience in the 9th, they won't have oral argument for nearly a year, if then

jcutonilli · Jan 21, 2020

The oral arguments have been scheduled for 2 April 2020.

https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/calend...ourt of Appeals, Pasadena&dates=1-3&year=2020

esqappellate · Jan 21, 2020

jcutonilli said:
The oral arguments have been scheduled for 2 April 2020.

https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/calend...ourt of Appeals, Pasadena&dates=1-3&year=2020

Wow, only seven months!

Boxcab · Jan 21, 2020

esqappellate said:
Wow, only seven months!

The Ninth has a full set of Justices now with all the Trump appointments!

:innocent0

.

danb · Jan 21, 2020

Do we know who the appeals judges are?

press1280 · Jan 21, 2020

danb said:
Do we know who the appeals judges are?

Probably won't know until nearly time for orals.

krucam · Jan 21, 2020

danb said:
Do we know who the appeals judges are?

press1280 said:
Probably won't know until nearly time for orals.

Charles Nichols on FB said the Monday of the week preceding argument...so March 30th.

jcutonilli · Mar 23, 2020

danb said:
Do we know who the appeals judges are?

The judges have been posted. https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/calend... Appeals, Pasadena&dates=1-3, 14-17&year=2020

Callahan (GW Bush), Lee (Trump) and Lynn (Visiting from Texas Northern, Clinton)

jcutonilli · Mar 23, 2020

Callahan was on the 3 judge Peruta panel and the en banc panel. She authored a dissent in the en banc panel.
Lee has been a judge less than a year.
Lynn was on the 3 judge panel in Fyock v Sunnydale

Occam · Mar 23, 2020

jcutonilli said:
Callahan was on the 3 judge Peruta panel and the en banc panel. She authored a dissent in the en banc panel.
Lee has been a judge less than a year.
Lynn was on the 3 judge panel in Fyock v Sunnydale

Can you parse that into ...
[ ] That's a Good Thing
[ ] That's a Bad Thing
[ ] It's a crap shoot

jcutonilli · Mar 23, 2020

Occam said:
Can you parse that into ...
[ ] That's a Good Thing
[ ] That's a Bad Thing
[ ] It's a crap shoot

Callahan is likely to vote for 2A rights based on how she voted in Peruta.
Lee is likely to vote for 2A rights based on conservative beliefs but does not have a long record as a judge.
Lynn is likely to vote against 2A rights based on Fyock.

Occam · Mar 23, 2020

jcutonilli said:
Callahan is likely to vote for 2A rights based on how she voted in Peruta.
Lee is likely to vote for 2A rights based on conservative beliefs but does not have a long record as a judge.
Lynn is likely to vote against 2A rights based on Fyock.

Thanks. I'll take 2/3 any time.

jcutonilli · Apr 1, 2020

The oral argument for this case will take place at 12pm ET (Noon) 9 am PT tomorrow Thurday 2 April. The link to hear the arguments is https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/live_oral_arguments.php Due to the corona virus, they will only hear the oral arguments for this case. The other cases' oral arguments were canceled (submitted on the briefs). The judges will likely be on video while the attorneys are on the phone.

motorcoachdoug · Apr 2, 2020

I am watching it now..

motorcoachdoug · Apr 2, 2020

very very interesting. They really give the state some heck over the 10rd limit in the magazine.

Duncan v Berrcerra

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

Member

Ultimate Member

HaveBlue

Ultimate Member

Attachments

Not Even ONE Indictment

President, MSI

Ultimate Member

President, MSI

MSI EM

dont be a dumbass

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Not Even ONE Indictment

Ultimate Member

Not Even ONE Indictment

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Log in

Forum statistics