Kamala Harris comes right out and says it too.

randomuser · Sep 18, 2019

https://www.mediaite.com/opinion/wa...for-kamala-harris-and-it-goes-poorly-for-him/

They all have the same agenda.

TheOriginalMexicanBob · Sep 18, 2019

She seems to be sinking fast in most polls...seen as too cynical...too phony...too anything negative. It breaks my heart. :rolleyes:

kdmag88 · Sep 18, 2019

I'm not sure what upsets me the most, the video, the article, or the comments...

Mr H · Sep 18, 2019

So, it's a #METOOMETOO...

Apparently her sanctimonious cackle is wearing on voters. She's fallen below the Yang Thang in polling this week.

j8064 · Sep 18, 2019

Like almost all of the the Demosh!ts, when she opens her mouth bullsh!t falls out. For example she states:

First of all, let’s be clear about what assault weapons are. They have been designed to kill a lot of human beings quickly. They are weapons of war with no place on the streets of a civil society.

While I can partially agree, it's clear she doesn't even know what an "assault rifle" that she wants to ban actually is. :banghead:

Last time I heard, true "select fire" arms that meet that criteria are already highly regulated . :sad20:

Perhaps she should take a history lesson before she opens her mouth? She's cozening up to some bad juju with her idea of definitions. From:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_rifle

The term assault rifle is generally attributed to Adolf Hitler, who, for propaganda purposes, used the German word Sturmgewehr (which translates to "assault rifle") as the new name for the MP43, subsequently known as the Sturmgewehr 44 or StG 44.[6][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] However, other sources dispute that Hitler had much to do with coining the new name besides signing the production order.[15] The StG 44 is generally considered the first selective fire military rifle to popularize the assault rifle concept.[6][8] Today, the term assault rifle is used to define firearms sharing the same basic characteristics as the StG 44.[6][8]

Excuse me. We are talking about semi automatic sporting rifles here - NOT assault rifles...

But, alas, facts? They do not matter...

:mad54:

K31 · Sep 18, 2019

I heard an interesting take on Beta Male and the rest of the ~~Trotskyites~~ Democratic front runners last night. That with the NRA become less effective to unite firearms owners and others who believe in the right to defend themselves due to their internal problems, these useless idiots are filling the gap.

Keep up the good work.

davsco · Sep 18, 2019

oh jeez guys, we need to get off the 'assault weapons' terminology bandwagon. we all know what everyone is talking about. it's ar-15's and heck yes they are incredible weapons and let's face it, that's why we want, love and have them, vs bolt actions and m1 carbines and mini 14s and rem 7400's. same reason military and police have and use them, and thus the reason we should have them, the whole protection against govt tyranny.

if you/we just dismiss threats and actions of the dems/libs because they're not using the technically correct terminology, then we're in for a rude awakening.

namrelio · Sep 18, 2019

davsco said:
oh jeez guys, we need to get off the 'assault weapons' terminology bandwagon. we all know what everyone is talking about. it's ar-15's and heck yes they are incredible weapons and let's face it, that's why we want, love and have them, vs bolt actions and m1 carbines and mini 14s and rem 7400's. same reason military and police have and use them, and thus the reason we should have them, the whole protection against govt tyranny.

if you/we just dismiss threats and actions of the dems/libs because they're not using the technically correct terminology, then we're in for a rude awakening.

I thought they were weapons of war now. :sad20:

Pale Ryder · Sep 18, 2019

TheOriginalMexicanBob said:
She seems to be sinking fast in most polls...seen as too cynical...too phony...too anything negative. It breaks my heart.

Angry black woman comes off as well, .................. angry. Who'd have guessed.

Occam · Sep 18, 2019

namrelio said:
I thought they were weapons of war now.

I've been hearing a new programmed talking point. Now these are "weapons meant for the battlefield."

Which is hilarious, because the AR-15 is the NOT MEANT FOR THE BATTLEFIELD tamed version.

smokey · Sep 18, 2019

So they're using emergency drills as proof that mass shootings are commonplace since actual mass shootings are a statistical anomaly. Interesting.

Occam · Sep 18, 2019

smokey0118 said:
So they're using emergency drills as proof that mass shootings are commonplace since actual mass shootings are a statistical anomaly. Interesting.

Well, when I was a kid, nuclear attacks were so common they tested those public sirens every month.

Jed195 · Sep 18, 2019

I remember every Monday at 1pm an air raid siren would sound, growing up in Parkville/Carney area.

ComeGet · Sep 18, 2019

Damn, I just realized that I do not own any assault rifles. So, I'm no longer worried about what Beta or Willie's ex have to say about them.

:innocent0

randomuser · Sep 19, 2019

ComeGet said:
Damn, I just realized that I do not own any assault rifles. So, I'm no longer worried about what Beta or Willie's ex have to say about them.

I'm about 80% sure I'm in the same boat.

HoCoShooter · Sep 19, 2019

She thinks there are 2 million “assault weapons” in the US??

Guess again, biotch.

welder516 · Sep 19, 2019

She can suk it Willie Davis style ...

BlueHeeler · Sep 19, 2019

Gun confiscation does not win elections in battleground states.

Neither does poling at 5.7%.

Bye, ~~Felicia~~ Kamala

Docster · Sep 19, 2019

davsco said:
oh jeez guys, we need to get off the 'assault weapons' terminology bandwagon. we all know what everyone is talking about. it's ar-15's and heck yes they are incredible weapons and let's face it, that's why we want, love and have them, vs bolt actions and m1 carbines and mini 14s and rem 7400's. same reason military and police have and use them, and thus the reason we should have them, the whole protection against govt tyranny.

if you/we just dismiss threats and actions of the dems/libs because they're not using the technically correct terminology, then we're in for a rude awakening.

YES!! So much preaching to the choir over this. Tell it to somebody who might learn the difference. We already know.

Major03 · Sep 19, 2019

I'll say this...at least the left is starting to be a LITTLE more intellectually honest about what they are really trying to accomplish. I trust that middle America will be disagree with their agenda.

Kamala Harris comes right out and says it too.

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Active Member

Banana'd

Garrett Co Hooligan #1

"Part of that Ultra MAGA Crowd"

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Not Even ONE Indictment

2A TEACHER

Not Even ONE Indictment

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Deplorable Welder

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Log in

Forum statistics