Will Frosh be able to handle not being able to stash anything he disagrees with in his desk drawer?
Over / under on the amount of times he uses the word "nuts" during his talking points? I'm setting it at 5.
Frosh's view of what the 2A is for frankly scares me....
Smigiel is a rock star....
Should we inundate Sen Frosh's email with citations from the Federalist Papers stating the true intent of the 2A?
We aren't going to change Froshs view point as he has an agenda. As I previously posted, we need to gather the facts and start changing perceptions of the people. We need to have continued debate on media and be able to slam the opposition with facts.
I'll bet he doesn't use it at all.
Looks like you won
I thought the debate went very well for us! Though, my mouth just about hit the floor when Frosh said that the 2A wasn't meant to protect against tyranny. Oh and apparently rifles are now weapons of mass destruction. Ridiculous!
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2
In a discussion even I will use the terminology most familiar to the person I'm talking with, you can correct the verbiage later. If you constantly correct them you can end making it worse by having them think you are condescending to themIn watching, I'm reminded of how the Emperor cloaked his true evil when appearing before the Galactic Senate. I'd like to see Frosh start foaming at the mouth that everyone who wants any type of gun needs to be psychologically examined.
(And someone tell Smigel they are magazines, not clips)