Kharn
Ultimate Member
I figure it means they requested the trial record. They are digging deeper into something. That is a good sign.
Definitely, someone wants some bedtime reading.
I figure it means they requested the trial record. They are digging deeper into something. That is a good sign.
Do we really want SCOTUS taking this case?
If they wanted to chip away at Heller, this would be a good place to start.
Compare google searches for
site:supremecourt.gov docket "record requested" "petition denied"
vs
site:supremecourt.gov docket "record requested" "petition granted"
The latter results stay in 2010+ cases much longer than the former
Do we really want SCOTUS taking this case?
If they wanted to chip away at Heller, this would be a good place to start.
I figure it means they requested the trial record. They are digging deeper into something. That is a good sign.
Rough #s?
Fellas, remember- Caetano is a homeless woman, represented by a Boston public defender, with an amici by Volokh, Project AWARE, a woman's anti-violence on women's group.
My bitter cynical self says The Wise Latina Sotomayer, The Sturdy Elena, and Old Role Model Ginsberg's SJW clerks are spinning madly to find a way for these three at least to fall all over themselves ostensibly supporting women,
with all sorts of high-minded legal prose and horse manure, while still banning guns or anything like them, including tasers, for self-defense,
on some sort of technicality, and thus the need to find minutia buried in the history.
I'm hoping to be proven wrong, but not holding my breath.
Sorry, the all out hypocrisy and mendacity on the Left, top to bottom on Dem party line in obvious WH spinners collusion with the StateRunMedia journolistas "to let no crisis go to waste",
like radical jihadi's killing defense-less women and children in San Bernardino,
in order to once again dance in still their warm blood to push "gun control" has gotten me in a very foul mood.
Fellas, remember- Caetano is a homeless woman, represented by a Boston public defender, with an amici by Volokh, Project AWARE, a woman's anti-violence on women's group.
My bitter cynical self says The Wise Latina Sotomayer, The Sturdy Elena, and Old Role Model Ginsberg's SJW clerks are spinning madly to find a way for these three at least to fall all over themselves ostensibly supporting women,
with all sorts of high-minded legal prose and horse manure, while still banning guns or anything like them, including tasers, for self-defense,
on some sort of technicality, and thus the need to find minutia buried in the history.
I'm hoping to be proven wrong, but not holding my breath.
Sorry, the all out hypocrisy and mendacity on the Left, top to bottom on Dem party line in obvious WH spinners collusion with the StateRunMedia journolistas "to let no crisis go to waste",
like radical jihadi's killing defense-less women and children in San Bernardino,
in order to once again dance in still their warm blood to push "gun control" has gotten me in a very foul mood.
Probably won't see anything at least until they get the record.
Prohibited States/Counties/Cities for Stun Guns
The following STATES are ILLEGAL to own or possess a stun gun:
Hawaii
Illinois – LEGAL but has restrictions – Illinois Stun Gun Laws
Massachusetts
Michigan – Stun Guns are prohibited. Only devices that contain an identification and tracking system that dispenses coded material when the device is used are allowed. TASER devices are the only ones currently legal.
New Jersey
New York
Rhode Island
District of Columbia
The following CITIES are ILLEGAL to own or possess a stun gun:
Annapolis, MD
Baltimore, MD
Chicago, IL
Philadelpia, PA
The following COUNTIES are ILLEGAL to own or possess a stun gun:
Baltimore County, MD
Crawford County, IA