Young Opening Brief Filed

press1280 · Jul 25, 2018

ToolAA said:
This gives me great hope.

At the end of that clip judge Clifton basically asks “In order for the state to win we need to rule that the second amendment does not apply outside of the home.” The state’s attorney just laughs and says “basically yes”. He was probably realizing at that point he was going to be out of a job.

After they fire him maybe he can work for the NRA he might have better luck on the other side of the isle.

Notice though that Clifton did indeed rule that way although like many other judges, dances all around it. Instead of just saying the right doesn't apply outside the home, they say that the right can be regulated in public but a public carry permit which is never issued is a reasonable regulation :sad20:

The legal gymnastics are getting downright pathetic. It's time for SCOTUS to drive a stake into it once and for all.

dblas · Jul 25, 2018

wolfwood said:
I won

The best two words read on these forums, congratulations good sir.

dblas · Jul 25, 2018

Peaceful John said:
Forget standing before them. At this point they should kneel before Wolfwood.

I remember when Wolfwood first posted about Young in early 2013. I thought then that here was a youthful lawyer stepping beyond his natural limits. You know that cartoon of the mouse flipping off the swooping hawk? Like that. But in a short time Wolfwood began winning, sometimes in a minor way and sometimes bigly (Young being bigly.)

A 9th CA panel stating that the 2A protects open carry? No lawyer has ever done that before. Bigly, indeed.

^^^^^ THIS ^^^^^^^

And if Wolfwood ever makes it out here, the first round is on me (I'm sure, followed by everyone else).

Bigfoot21075 · Jul 25, 2018

dblas said:
^^^^^ THIS ^^^^^^^

And if Wolfwood ever makes it out here, the first round is on me (I'm sure, followed by everyone else).

I am stunned. WOW!

RobSky · Jul 25, 2018

ToneGrail said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9RwTqFIKZU

Even with the poor performance, vote was 2-1 :sad20:

.

Cal68 · Jul 25, 2018

wolfwood said:
I won

Congratulations my friend. I am so proud of your accomplishment. A very big thank you on behalf of myself and all my 2A friends. Absolutely brilliant.

Cal68

motorcoachdoug · Jul 25, 2018

Congrats to you sir!!!Now the next question is how can we use this in our lawsuit against Frosh and MGA? Also will be very interesting on how 9CA appeals court will rule on NICHOLS v. BROWN panel will rule as well now that Young ruling has come out. I hope Frosh does read it ,but in reality I know he wont, and really start thinking ...... I would be interested to hear your thoughts on this and how it can help us.

eruby · Jul 25, 2018

Cue the da da da da da da music

Atlasarmory · Jul 25, 2018

Tagged to follow

daNattyFatty · Jul 25, 2018

press1280 said:
Notice though that Clifton did indeed rule that way although like many other judges, dances all around it. Instead of just saying the right doesn't apply outside the home, they say that the right can be regulated in public but a public carry permit which is never issued is a reasonable regulation

The legal gymnastics are getting downright pathetic. It's time for SCOTUS to drive a stake into it once and for all.

I was gonna post this exactly. You straight up ask the guy "hey are you saying that it's a ban?" and the guy replies yes, and you still side with them. All I can do is shake my head.

The district and circuit nominations can't go quickly enough.

mxrider · Jul 25, 2018

Peaceful John said:
I don't understand. If the SCoTUS determines that the protected 2A right is open carry, is that decision not immediately (McDonald) incorporated at the individual state level? Would not that mean that no license is required to open carry in any state, regardless of itinerancy?

Was just referring to the specific 9th circuit ruling

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

press1280 · Jul 25, 2018

daNattyFatty said:
I was gonna post this exactly. You straight up ask the guy "hey are you saying that it's a ban?" and the guy replies yes, and you still side with them. All I can do is shake my head.

The district and circuit nominations can't go quickly enough.

And that was a Bush 43 nominee.

swinokur · Jul 25, 2018

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/...2LSjmOdJQr6FNCufUZhEi04xI&bt_ts=1532515071174

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Jim12 · Jul 25, 2018

Judge Napolitano on FBN (Fios 617) is about to comment on this case, after the commercial break...

Inigoes · Jul 25, 2018

wolfwood said:
I won

I forgot to congratulate you.

You got a two-fer!

You got the 9CA to acknowledge the 2A exists outside the home.

and

You won the Open Carry versus Concealed Carry argument! :toothless

fred55 · Jul 25, 2018

Great job Wolfwood! And it's great to see the 2A getting the support that was intended. fred55

danb · Jul 25, 2018

wolfwood said:
I won

congratulations on a well deserved victory!!

MindTheGAP · Jul 25, 2018

Peaceful John said:
I don't understand. If the SCoTUS determines that the protected 2A right is open carry, is that decision not immediately (McDonald) incorporated at the individual state level? Would not that mean that no license is required to open carry in any state, regardless of itinerancy?

This is what I thought, though a few pages back it was explained to me / the room that, no, it doesn't automatically trickle down to individual states' level - yet.

fightinbluhen51 · Jul 25, 2018

Inigoes said:
I forgot to congratulate you.

You got a two-fer!

You got the 9CA to acknowledge the 2A exists outside the home.

and

You won the Open Carry versus Concealed Carry argument!

Legendary status unlocked and achieved.

Congrats wolfwood!

BeoBill · Jul 25, 2018

Peaceful John said:
I don't understand. If the SCoTUS determines that the protected 2A right is open carry, is that decision not immediately (McDonald) incorporated at the individual state level? Would not that mean that no license is required to open carry in any state, regardless of itinerancy?

That only seems to work for Travel Bans and the like that the LEFT approves of. Buckle up - turbulence ahead...

BUT this does pave the way of a favorable ruling here some day. Or the Curran Gang, the MGA and Frosh to be bludgeoned by the USSC into granting us our civil right, long denied, without strings and tap dancing.

Young Opening Brief Filed

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

Ultimate Member

Past President, MSI

Past President, MSI

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Confederate Jew

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Former MSI Treasurer

Ultimate Member

In a State of Bliss

Let Freedom Ring

Head'n for the hills

Senior

dont be a dumbass

Active Member

"Quack Pot Call Honker"

Crank in the Third Row

Users who are viewing this thread

Log in

Forum statistics