148 Grain Wadcutter .357 Magnum?

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • august1410

    Marcas Registradas
    Apr 10, 2009
    22,562
    New Bern, NC
    Has anyone else used 148 grain DEWC in a .357 Magnum load? I have a ton of these things and I just ran out of 158 grain projectiles. There is some info on the interwebs, but I'd rather ask people I actually know.

    These will be used in a 6" S&W 586. The powders I have are H110, Titegroup and Bullseye.

    Thoughts?
     

    BUFF7MM

    ☠Buff➐㎣☠
    Mar 4, 2009
    13,578
    Garrett County
    Has anyone else used 148 grain DEWC in a .357 Magnum load? I have a ton of these things and I just ran out of 158 grain projectiles. There is some info on the interwebs, but I'd rather ask people I actually know.

    These will be used in a 6" S&W 586. The powders I have are H110, Titegroup and Bullseye.

    Thoughts?

    No help here Joe, but I’m sure J8084 should be along with some info. I’m pretty sure he’s loaded the 148’s before.
     

    Shazam

    Active Member
    Dec 20, 2012
    732
    Ive loaded DEWC in a hot 38 special load for use in a snuby. But that's well short of 357 magnum. I think that at magnum velocity any soft lead projectile will tend to lead up the barrel. A jacketed bullet or use of a hard cast lead with a gas check would be a better choice. Tightgroup and Bullseye are too fast for magnum loads.
     

    august1410

    Marcas Registradas
    Apr 10, 2009
    22,562
    New Bern, NC
    Ive loaded DEWC in a hot 38 special load for use in a snuby. But that's well short of 357 magnum. I think that at magnum velocity any soft lead projectile will tend to lead up the barrel. A jacketed bullet or use of a hard cast lead with a gas check would be a better choice. Tightgroup and Bullseye are too fast for magnum loads.

    I found online where someone was using 16 grains of H110 with a 148 gr DEWC in a .357 Magnum case.

    I don't have a specific purpose for the loads. I'm not looking to take out a rhino in Walmart or anything. I just have a few hundred wadcutters I acquired and I'm looking for something new and different to do.
     

    gwchem

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Dec 18, 2014
    3,445
    SoMD
    The rhinos in my local walmart might call for a bigger caliber than .357. Good lord. Put the fork down, America.
     

    Trekker

    Active Member
    Oct 20, 2011
    689
    Harford County
    If you are just looking to use the 148gr DEWC out of .357mag cases, then you could use either the titegroup or bullseye to make rounds like a .38spl, just longer in overall length. I have frequently read that H110 wants to have the case near full, but I expect that a full charge of H110 will lead to a fair bit of leading from the DEWC.
     

    Biggfoot44

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 2, 2009
    33,145
    So , are you looking for mild wadcutter loads that happened to be loaded in .357 cases ? Wadcutters loaded to full boogie magum levels ? Or inbetween to +P .38 equiv , or a hair hotter ?



    Anything other than first , begs the question . Are those swaged or hard cast Wadcutters ?
     

    august1410

    Marcas Registradas
    Apr 10, 2009
    22,562
    New Bern, NC
    I’d like to work up a full blown magnum load using these
    b256c43c7332dfdfe529fd7058eee73d.jpg
    eee6c24882f72a07b4419f6fffd00f6e.jpg



    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     

    Biggfoot44

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 2, 2009
    33,145
    It can sorta be done .

    You can hypothetically load up to that pressure level . But due to the decreased powder capacity of the inherently deeply seated bullet , less potential vels . And the prodigious bearing surface of DEWC's will also be a factor .

    I know that 900fps plus from .38 cases is a real thing ( if not quite meeting new wave psi standards ) . So off top of head , I would predict 1200 plus fps for this .

    I Have to ( do important things) followed by ( important nap ) . So I'll try to find actual data later tonight .
     

    j8064

    Garrett Co Hooligan #1
    Feb 23, 2008
    11,635
    Deep Creek
    I'm not a lot of help, Joe. I load 140 gr SWC's in my 38 Spl and 158 gr SWC's with gas checks in my 357's. Since those are hard cast bullets I'd be comfortable testing some loads at the low end of a 141 gr DEWC published load. Lyman has published recipes. I agree I'd start with a powder like Bullseye where you'd have lower velocity and lower pressure.
    Good luck.
     

    Biggfoot44

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 2, 2009
    33,145
    No , if Joe wants magnum vels on purpose, those fast burning powders will max out on pressure long before his targeted velocities .

    For mild loads with fast powder , would be about 0.2gr more than .38spl loads . But even .38 start loads probably wouldn't stick a bullet in the bore , unless you had a really , really rough bore .

    For mild , use .38 start loads for Bullseye or Tightgroup , and work up for tightest groups.

    For magnum loads , I'll probably find more data for Unique and 2400 , but I'll see what I can come up with .
     

    John from MD

    American Patriot
    MDS Supporter
    May 12, 2005
    22,906
    Socialist State of Maryland
    I found online where someone was using 16 grains of H110 with a 148 gr DEWC in a .357 Magnum case.

    I don't have a specific purpose for the loads. I'm not looking to take out a rhino in Walmart or anything. I just have a few hundred wadcutters I acquired and I'm looking for something new and different to do.

    This load will lead up your gun!:sad20:
     

    Biggfoot44

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 2, 2009
    33,145
    Be slightly creative, go for "full power WC" vs the usual "midrange WC " .

    Seek a vel of +/- 900fps . This used to be a .38spl factory load back in the day , so duplicating in a .357 is no sweat.

    ************

    Getting back on loads .

    That H110 load above would be Way too much , IF the bullet in question was actually a WC ( ie mostly flush seated in case ) vs some SWC or FP of same weight.

    Don't consider this a recomendation at this time , but a H110 @ top SAAMI pressures would be in neighborhood of 12gr.

    Meanwhile , Bullseye loaded to similar pressures, with 5.8gr , with arbitrary starting of 5.1 .

    Reality of my recommendations- With Bullseye , start with 3.5gr , workup . When you find acceptable accuracy at at least 900fps , declare victory !
     

    John from MD

    American Patriot
    MDS Supporter
    May 12, 2005
    22,906
    Socialist State of Maryland
    I shoot them all the time out of my 1851 Colt with a .38 spl conversion cylinder on it. I have to push them a little faster than normal as the skirt has to expand from .358 to .379, my bore size. 3.5 of Bullseye works great and I can actually get 1 inch groups at 16yards from the bench.
     

    Magnumite

    Ultimate Member
    Dec 17, 2007
    6,571
    Harford County, Maryland
    Joe, I used a whole bunch of those way back in my action pistol shooting days using a 6" Security Six revolver. I didn't care for using the short 38 cases in the longer chambers. I used between 3.3 and 3.5 grains of Bulleye (whatever the powder measure was throwing from that cavity that day), standard small pistol primer and cast 148 grain DEWC. I seated and roll crimped to the front groove of the most tapered end of the bullet to help using the speed loaders. These loads were accurate, reliable and chrono data indicated very consistent ballistics (not like the popular too low pressure loads so popular in 38 Special cases). They easily met the required 120 minimum power factor even on cold days. IIRC, I was running around 825-850 fps.

    I used Unique for a spell but it didn't provide any benefits. Also tried Green Dot but it was too slow for that pressure load. Not sure where you Titegroup is on the burn ratings. I personally see no need for an H110 driven DEWC... better bullets are available for the big snorting loads.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,402
    Messages
    7,280,333
    Members
    33,450
    Latest member
    angel45z

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom