HPRB Statistics 2015-2016

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • esqappellate

    President, MSI
    Feb 12, 2012
    7,407
    So they acknowledge the breach and say, "sorry"? That doesn't seem sufficient to me. Does it?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    They did a bit more than that. They reached out to the receiptant and asked for and received assurances that the release was destroyed. They say that have taken unspecified steps to ensure it doesn't happen again. The statute does not provide for a penalty. I personally would like it if the persons responsible could be drawn and quartered, but that seems, on reflection, a little extreme. If a disclosed person suffered damages, they could try to sue MD under the State Tort Claims Act (maybe), but they did pretty much everything a court could otherwise order them to do, save individual notification of the breach. Feel free to suggest that course of action. My focus was to highlight the error and make sure it didn't happen again. That seems to be accomplished.
     

    mjester93

    Member
    Mar 28, 2017
    92
    Southern Maryland
    I was able to locate some additional information - the HPRB results from 1986-1988.

    ENwLNch.png
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    274,931
    Messages
    7,259,497
    Members
    33,350
    Latest member
    Rotorboater

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom