hooligan82
Ultimate Member
I figured that may have been brought up in response to question 3 Judge Legg wanted to discuss during the teleconference. This whole process is very foreign to me, and I'm probably reading too far into things.
Your chances (and mine) are zero. Stay relates back to the March 5, date of the order. Once the stay is lifted (if it is), then we get processed without regard to 5ii.
Not being a lawyer, it has no bearing on the fact that two different courts rule in two different ways over the same issue?
I'm so lost. Tried to catch up, too, but just got confused. Did something happen today?
Pg 390...
When you're logged on to MDS, there are a lot less pages in a thread than when you look at the thread while not logged on.I count 197...
The order is not going to change, it is the product of the Thursday teleconference and the parties are merely implementing what the judge told them to do. Even apart from that, it is completely unlikely that the court will address pending applications which are not before him. That is what the stay is about - the state gets to sit on these applications.
Going by the hand written number in the lower left hand corner of the checks. ~400 applications have been submitted thus far (purely speculation on my part).
It may be, but there are a few of us who had "6X,XXX" numbers on their checks, so.....
The order is not going to change, it is the product of the Thursday teleconference and the parties are merely implementing what the judge told them to do. Even apart from that, it is completely unlikely that the court will address pending applications which are not before him. That is what the stay is about - the state gets to sit on these applications.
Was that pre-ruling 3/5/2012 or post?
Post, but the kicker may be that I had applied (obviously denied) about 8 years ago.
Thinking maybe they used my original number?
+1. Will they be sitting on our apps or will we all have to reapply again?If a stay (even temporary) is in effect, then doesn't that mean the 5(ii) is still in effect and any application before the State Police can be denied under "good and substantial" reasoning?
+1. Will they be sitting on our apps or will we all have to reapply again?
If a stay (even temporary) is in effect, then doesn't that mean the 5(ii) is still in effect and any application before the State Police can be denied under "good and substantial" reasoning?
+1. Will they be sitting on our apps or will we all have to reapply again?
If a stay (even temporary) is in effect, then doesn't that mean the 5(ii) is still in effect and any application before the State Police can be denied under "good and substantial" reasoning?
esqappellate, thanks very much for always making things crystal clear (even if it's not always what we want to hear).
Every time I read anything from Gansler & Co., I'm reminded of Joe Pesci's line in My Cousin Vinnie; "Everything that guy just said is bulsh%t."
So, nothing to expect here until May 24 at earliest...about two months of cooling heels.
Lord knows that judges disagree all the time. Such is the nature of the law. But not generally on the nature of a stay. That is pretty much common ground.