HPRB Under Attack: Hearings 3/12

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • KevinK

    Ultimate Member
    Jun 24, 2008
    4,973
    Carroll County, Md
    hprb...jpg
     

    danb

    dont be a dumbass
    Feb 24, 2013
    22,704
    google is your friend, I am not.
    If Maryland continues to go down a path of more restrictions and more of taking rights away .
    The Moms and other anti's will find the end result not what they are looking for . I am wondering if we just keep letting them hose us will be better so when they make that last push , they will get sued at the highest court level .

    This is more of a thought and not an absolute in my thoughts , kinda just throwing it out .

    The Supreme Court has already docketed a case for October. They will docket another. Ever notice how many Supreme Court cases end in "v. Maryland?" We like to be spanked.
     

    TexDefender

    Ultimate Member
    Feb 28, 2017
    1,572
    Getting rid of the Handgun board is like stuffing the ballot box. At least on the Handgun board you had a change of actually having a firearm expert on it.
     

    Rack&Roll

    R.I.P
    Patriot Picket
    Jan 23, 2013
    22,304
    Bunkerville, MD
    The DemocRat Conundrum:

    MGA proposes extremely unpopular bills to punish political opponents, then they complain about the number of testimony witnesses these unpopular bills generate, so then they cut all testimony time because there is too much testimony
     

    Occam

    Not Even ONE Indictment
    MDS Supporter
    Feb 24, 2018
    20,239
    Montgomery County
    MGA proposes extremely unpopular bills to punish political opponents, then they complain about the number of testimony witnesses these unpopular bills generate, so then they cut all testimony time because there is too much testimony

    You have an unfortunately great talent at boiling their crap down to what it really is. Don't get me wrong - I appreciate it being called what it actually is.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    274,924
    Messages
    7,259,238
    Members
    33,349
    Latest member
    christian04

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom