Cecil State's Attorney - Stripper?

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!

    • Register Log in
    j_h_smith

    j_h_smith

    Ultimate Member
    Jul 28, 2007
    28,516
    I'm not sure how I feel about it. He was in his hotel room. He did however expose himself. But for some woman to use a telephoto lens to take pictures, I think she should be the one charged.
     
    danb

    danb

    dont be a dumbass
    Feb 24, 2013
    22,704
    google is your friend, I am not.
    With his wife.

    lol. Maryland is so ridiculous.

    If he is happy dancing about having sex with his wife in an OC hotel on the tenth floor, more power to him. It's OC, if this is the worst thing those idiots saw, they are lucky.
     
    C

    chuck

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Feb 1, 2016
    1,538
    Anne Arundel
    “I have nightmares because of you. I argue with my husband because it’s all I can talk about.”

    Sounds like this woman is jealous because she can't stop thinking about him.
     
    pbharvey

    pbharvey

    Habitual Testifier
    MDS Supporter
    Dec 27, 2012
    30,188
    chuck said:
    “I have nightmares because of you. I argue with my husband because it’s all I can talk about.”

    Sounds like this woman is jealous because she can't stop thinking about him.
    Click to expand...

    She was so upset she used a zoom lens. :)
     
    swinokur

    swinokur

    In a State of Bliss
    Patriot Picket
    Apr 15, 2009
    55,458
    Westminster USA
    If the charge was a misdemeanor that COULD have resulted in a sentence of more than 2 years or a felony with a possible sentence of more than 1 year, then yes he would be prohibited. Note it's the possible penalty, not what he actually received.

    ETA He was convicted of among other things Indecent Exposure, which is a misdemeanor that has a penalty of up to 3 years in prison

    Based on that, he is now a prohibited person.
     
    HordesOfKailas

    HordesOfKailas

    Still learning
    Feb 7, 2016
    2,205
    Utah
    Jesus the man was with his wife in a private room on the 10th floor. Sounds like the idiots who testified should be charged for voyeurism. And what about the wife? It takes two to sex.
     
    swinokur

    swinokur

    In a State of Bliss
    Patriot Picket
    Apr 15, 2009
    55,458
    Westminster USA
    Was it Pee Wee?

    pulling on his pee pee? mug shot too
    .
     

    Attachments

    • pee wee.jpg
      pee wee.jpg
      9.1 KB · Views: 626
    • mug shot.jpg
      mug shot.jpg
      30.8 KB · Views: 562
    Last edited:
    B

    Blacksmith101

    Grumpy Old Man
    Jun 22, 2012
    22,263
    If you read the testimony you won't think it voyeurism. You'll wonder how a sicko like him ever got to a position of trust. Another example of the privileged ruling class.
     
    pbharvey

    pbharvey

    Habitual Testifier
    MDS Supporter
    Dec 27, 2012
    30,188
    Blacksmith101 said:
    If you read the testimony you won't think it voyeurism. You'll wonder how a sicko like him ever got to a position of trust. Another example of the privileged ruling class.
    Click to expand...

    It's crazy that a man with judgement this poor was in the running to be a judge.
     
    You must log in or register to reply here.

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
    Target Sports USA ad

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,382
    Messages
    7,279,534
    Members
    33,442
    Latest member
    PotomacRiver

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom