pcfixer
Ultimate Member
In a sad turn of events, U.S. District Court Judge William Young has issued a ruling that upholds Massachusetts’ ban on AR-15s and large-capacity magazines.
His reasoning? He says AR-15s are NOT protected by the 2nd Amendment (!!).
He wrote:
"The AR-15 and its analogs, along with large capacity magazines, are simply not weapons within the original meaning of the individual constitutional right to ‘bear arms’."
Received email this morning on this. I don't know where to find the ruling online.
Well maybe soon SCOTUS will hear 19-404 Worman v. Healey & GVR
His reasoning? He says AR-15s are NOT protected by the 2nd Amendment (!!).
He wrote:
"The AR-15 and its analogs, along with large capacity magazines, are simply not weapons within the original meaning of the individual constitutional right to ‘bear arms’."
Received email this morning on this. I don't know where to find the ruling online.
Well maybe soon SCOTUS will hear 19-404 Worman v. Healey & GVR