Delegate Robin Grammer
State Lawmaker
Judiciary just moved HB 96 and SB 346.
Third reader for SB346, which passed 47-0 in Senate:
http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2019RS/bills/sb/sb0346t.pdf
Which line is for " pre-FSA 2013 section requiring need to do the free MPCTC"
Third reader for SB346, which passed 47-0 in Senate:
http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2019RS/bills/sb/sb0346t.pdf
Which line is for " pre-FSA 2013 section requiring need to do the free MPCTC"
page 4 line 15, the course they refer to is the "free of charge" MPCTC one mentioned in b(14). That was the old online video course for those who remember. And I was wrong about the entire wear/carry class would also meet the requirement. It would have to be a police academy firearms certification under 3-207.
It looks like someone literally resurrected pages from the old pre-FSA 2013 law and then wrote the loan language into them. I really wonder if whoever wrote the senate version didn't realize they were working off of old repealed law.
The same. We are fine with these amendments. And yes showing up and testifying made a big difference
Here is link to other thread for SB 346:
I did not see an objection to the third reader for SB346 from MSI and it passed 47-0. All this does is make loaning a gun to someone whom you know to be prohibited a crime.
I think that is pre-existing stuff from FSA2013 and not new.What about the section at the end that says a "person may not sell, rent, or transfer....2. ammunition for a firearm to a minor...or 4. another deadly weapon to a minor."
I think I understand the intent, but could the common interpretation of the word "transfer" catch someone who simply hands ammunition to their child at the range. Also, it doesn't appear that a deadly weapon is defined in this section and that can be a broad term. Loaning your car (which can be a deadly weapon) to your 16 year old son could potentially count? Perhaps it's defined elsewhere?
What about the section at the end that says a "person may not sell, rent, or transfer....2. ammunition for a firearm to a minor...or 4. another deadly weapon to a minor."
I think I understand the intent, but could the common interpretation of the word "transfer" catch someone who simply hands ammunition to their child at the range. Also, it doesn't appear that a deadly weapon is defined in this section and that can be a broad term. Loaning your car (which can be a deadly weapon) to your 16 year old son could potentially count? Perhaps it's defined elsewhere?
One important thing to remember is that if this law is passed it will go into effect immediately. Not only do they knock you down but then kick you just for good measure.
One important thing to remember is that if this law is passed it will go into effect immediately. Not only do they knock you down but then kick you just for good measure.