Bigfoot21075
Ultimate Member
I was wondering, and I think it was covered here before, does having your wear/carry permit in Maryland allow you to cash (whatever payment) and carry firearms from an FFL?
The irony is if you have a permit you could be carrying while you make that purchase.
But, but, but ... the 7-day "cooling off" period will prevent you from acting out in violence with a newly-purchased firearm.
The irony is if you have a permit you could be carrying while you make that purchase.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
But, but, but ... the 7-day "cooling off" period will prevent you from acting out in violence with a newly-purchased firearm.
Even though you own 100 "old' firearms, duh.
Even more idiotic...
A Police Officer, in uniform, with his/her issued sidearm open carried in the holster... is also made to wait the seven day period to pick up a newly purchased regulated firearm.
Even though you own 100 "old' firearms, duh.
Just like the rest of us. Good.
Really?
I do not believe that it should be different... I want the same freedoms for ALL...
But I certainly would NEVER celebrate nor support the infringements of anyone else because I was not able to exercise the same rights.
Would you also say "Good" to the people of other states because they were in the same situation as we are here in Maryland.?
LE can buy normal AR's and standard cap mags, why the subjects can not do that, because of FSA2013.
I know where you stand and what you believe in, but I have to agree with DC-W on this. The MGA made 2 classes of people for firearms ownership: the haves and the have nots. Seeing that LE has to go through the same waiting period means that the line is not clear cut, but instead, it is in fact blurry for good reason.
They do need department letterhead, but they are allowed to keep the banned firearm, even after they leave the department or retire. That is ********. Either they are issued the weapon or they don't get one. No exemptions for LE should be granted in that respect. They should have to suffer like we do, when dealing with firearm laws in MD.While I understand your point. I cannot agree with his sentiment on the issue. It is rather selfish to say “Good” to anyone else’s infringement because we are infringed.
Think of it this way... If Pa. were to ban non HBAR ARs tomorrow... would you say “Good” because now they’re under the same infringement as we are?
As to the standard barrel ARs. Doesn’t the law require that the LEO obtain a written letter from their Department before the non HBAR rifle can be purchased? Isn’t that exemption in place to allow the purchase for work use?
I personally believe the law to be a ridiculous case of quibbling over a few ounces of weight. The HBARs are actually more durable and maintain accuracy better. The only advantage to the non HBAR... would be the ability to mount an M203 to it. But... hey... that’s just my thoughts on the topic.
And this(7) possession by a person who is retired in good standing from service with a law enforcement agency of the State or a local unit in the State and is not otherwise prohibited from receiving an assault weapon or detachable magazine if:
(i) the assault weapon or detachable magazine is sold or transferred to the person by the law enforcement agency on retirement; or
(ii) the assault weapon or detachable magazine was purchased or obtained by the person for official use with the law enforcement agency before retirement;
4–305.(a)This section does not apply to1)a .22 caliber rifle with a tubular magazine;OR(2)A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER OR A PERSON WHO RETIRED IN GOOD STANDING FROM SERVICE WITH A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OF THE UNITED STATES,THE STATE,OR ANY LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY IN THE STATE.(b)Aperson may not manufacture, sell, offer for sale, purchase, receive, or transfer a detachable magazine that has a capacity of more than [20]10rounds of ammunition for a firearm.
Just like the rest of us. Good.