You are quoting the dissent out of context. That also only accounts for 2 of 9 votes. Who are the 5 who will vote for open carry? Kagan? Ginsburg?
No, I'm not quoting out of context. Read the dissent, that's the exact moment Thomas stated they should have granted cert. How about the other 3 that participated in Heller...That equals a 5-4 vote for the right to open carry.
The dissent also says:
Quoting Thomas:
"Even if other Members of the Court do not agree that the Second Amendment likely protects a right to public carry, the time has come for the Court to answer this important question definitively."
So maybe other members dont think there is any right to bear arms?
From that statement, Thomas obviously doesn't have a clue what the other members are thinking...Maybe they're thinking that Peruta sought to carry a concealed weapon(and that's EXACTLY what he did), which they already indicated in Heller that the 2nd Amendment doesn't protect such a right, and therefore he lacks a damage.
Funny thing, I'm being accused of calling Thomas " incompetent ", yet your side is saying the Justices who signed onto the Heller decision actually don't agree with it...That's judicial incompetence at its finest right there, if it were true...That, we'll find out soon enough with Norman.