Swalwell Threatens "Nukes" If Americans Don't Hand Over Their Guns
- Thread starter CrazySanMan
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
It would most differently lead to war if that stupid lowlife )(*)(&*)(_+)( tried to do take away peoples weapons not to mention how many law enforcement and military would refuse to obey the order to disarm us as well. It would be a civil war that would make the first one seem like a walk in the park. Make no mistake the demorats in Cali and across the us want control of the people and the ability for us to defend ourselves as well.
Pale Ryder
Ultimate Member
Victory. Riding the blue wave coattails. This AH wants access to the nukes. One of twenty or so eyeing 2020 if the queen Clinton doesn't run.
I think from now on any political figure that recommends gun confiscation has to be the person that goes door to door to retrieve said guns , because we all know if you want a job done right you have to do it yourself .
Is the current administration still going after Bump stocks as well ... just a thought.
tomgreco
Ammo addict
Can the military arrest him on the threat to the Constitution?
FMD
Active Member
Somebody needs to read up on their Matt Bracken, "What I Saw at the Coups."
He's making direct threats of violence against large numbers of people...ERPO him!
dad4
Ultimate Member
I believe Schumer & Pelosi should immediately condemn his rhetoric and state their position on this matter.
RIGHT, when pigs fly.
RIGHT, when pigs fly.
They don't understand that. It is amusing that if they came for my guns they would take my AR and leave my Garand.
It's folks like Swalwell that drive the sale of small, concealable guns like the Ruger LCP.
The Dem's say they want to reduce gun deaths, yet they stoke the flames with these inflammatory statements.
No reasonable individual truly trusts the government to do what is best for them. We accept that there are rules set in place to maintain a civilized society, but we do not accept the absolute rule of the government. The Dem's have been inconvenienced by the Bill of Rights for decades. They won't be satisfied until all 10 Amendments have been twisted by the courts until they are nothing but a historical artifact.
The Dem's say they want to reduce gun deaths, yet they stoke the flames with these inflammatory statements.
No reasonable individual truly trusts the government to do what is best for them. We accept that there are rules set in place to maintain a civilized society, but we do not accept the absolute rule of the government. The Dem's have been inconvenienced by the Bill of Rights for decades. They won't be satisfied until all 10 Amendments have been twisted by the courts until they are nothing but a historical artifact.
Don't forget the 80% movement. You ask why people spend more to finish an 80% Glockenspiel than they would pay for a new one? Look no further. If I were an ardent Second Amendment supporter I would have spent thousands on 80%'s in recent years. Good thing I'm a liberal.
Michelle O 2020!
- Jan 30, 2013
- 34,042
The problem is they believe the government can and will do what's best for people if the right people are in government.
That's why they're horrified when the "wrong" people are elected, and why they can't accept the results.
They also don't understand the limits of government and why, historically, it was set up with checks and balances.
They just insist on plowing forward with their own tyrannical agenda, believing, "It's them or us."
- Aug 29, 2016
- 763
I'm starting to think it's time to invest in a second safe (one for the guns the government doesn't know I have).
Safes are hard to hide.
shootin the breeze
Missed it by that much
Tactical furniture would be better though expensive. Can also prep for long term storage and bury some. Wolverines!
Bury them in your neighbor's back yard, like I do.
whistlersmother
Peace through strength
The only problem is he will bury his in your backyard...
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Users who are viewing this thread
Latest posts
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
-
-
-
-
Hair-trigger posting... please include more than just the "headline" (1 Viewer)- Started by Mr H
- Replies: 13
-
-
