California Magazine Ban found Constitutional

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • GolfR

    Ultimate Member
    Oct 20, 2016
    1,324
    Columbia MD

    danb

    dont be a dumbass
    Feb 24, 2013
    22,704
    google is your friend, I am not.
    post the actual opinion. These look like they relate to the equal protection claim, not the 2nd Amendment claim.

    Also, this looks like the District court ruling, not appellate. There was already an appellate ruling on the 2nd amendment claim, which struck it down in July, but that is on appeal as well.
     

    PapiBarcelona

    Ultimate Member
    Jan 1, 2011
    7,343
    I read on Calguns that this one was a parallel case that was filed, and not the other one that's going on
     

    Rob R.

    Active Member
    Oct 29, 2016
    771
    Harford Co
    Atleast they got a small victory in regards to the 1 handgun per month law


    Alvin Doe, et al. v. Attorney General Xavier Becerra, et al.
    2/8/18: VICTORY! The Third District Court of Appeal has published an opinion in our favor!

    This lawsuit was filed to challenge an illegal California Attorney General / Department of Justice policy that ignores the text of state statutes and denies handgun sales to law-abiding people with both a Certificate of Eligibility & FFL03 (collector license).

    Plaintiffs-Appellants argued that:

    The DOJ’s Enforcement Policy Is Inconsistent With The Plain Meaning Of Section 27535.
    Legislative History Confirms That The Licensed Collectors’ Exemption Applies To The Purchase Of Any Handgun.
    Applying The Licensed Collectors’ Exemption To All Handgun Purchases Is Consistent With The Purpose Of The Statute.
    DOJ’s Enforcement Policy Incorrectly Interprets Federal Law.
    The Enforcement Policy Is An Invalid Underground Regulation.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    274,921
    Messages
    7,259,000
    Members
    33,349
    Latest member
    christian04

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom