Back To The Future - MD Gen Assembly Version

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!

    • Register Log in
    hodgepodge

    hodgepodge

    Senior Member (Gold)
    Sep 3, 2009
    10,092
    Arnold, MD
    So they can publish the results before the vote is taken. Are you saying process may be fixed? Not in our General Assembly!


     
    Biggfoot44

    Biggfoot44

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 2, 2009
    33,137
    I open the the pdf , and it shows the vote as taken place on 3/7/18.

    Vote unanimous , all Committee Members added as Co Sponsors.

    Looks as if took two days to update website.
     
    94hokie

    94hokie

    Active Member
    Mar 29, 2015
    832
    Severna Park, MD
    Yes, it basically says that the state has to tell you when charged of a crime that makes you prohibited from having firearms that if convicted you will have to turn them over, then if convicted, they have to tell you again and then you have two business days to transfer them either to the police or an ffl and 5 business days to give proof of transfer to the court
     
    S

    snakep

    Ultimate Member
    Mar 4, 2013
    1,051
    Behind enemy lines...
    94hokie said:
    Yes, it basically says that the state has to tell you when charged of a crime that makes you prohibited from having firearms that if convicted you will have to turn them over, then if convicted, they have to tell you again and then you have two business days to transfer them either to the police or an ffl and 5 business days to give proof of transfer to the court
    Click to expand...

    Thanks 94hokie.
     
    H

    Hattie

    Active Member
    Sep 18, 2012
    179
    Post-conviction attestation requirement seems to raise a potential Fifth Amendment problem, e.f., where attestation is required of a person already prohibited before the conviction.
     
    C

    crofrog

    Member
    Nov 18, 2005
    32
    Severna Park, MD
    94hokie said:
    Yes, it basically says that the state has to tell you when charged of a crime that makes you prohibited from having firearms that if convicted you will have to turn them over, then if convicted, they have to tell you again and then you have two business days to transfer them either to the police or an ffl and 5 business days to give proof of transfer to the court
    Click to expand...

    Are you sure that's all that it says, the modifications to 4-303 look way more significant than that. Looks like it would make it impossible to transport "assault rifles" in Maryland.
     
    Biggfoot44

    Biggfoot44

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 2, 2009
    33,137
    No , I just re-reread the Bill for the Bazillionth time. It only applies to a Person convicted of one of the specified crimes, during the 2 day window to take it to LE or FFL .
     
    You must log in or register to reply here.

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
    Ardent Firearms Training

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,401
    Messages
    7,280,198
    Members
    33,449
    Latest member
    Tactical Shepherd

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom