It was, in US v Stewart in 2003. It was GVR'ed in light of Raich.
Wikipedia page on the case
I learned something new here. So the 9th Circuit originally ruled "for" machine guns??? Color me shocked.
It was, in US v Stewart in 2003. It was GVR'ed in light of Raich.
Wikipedia page on the case
I learned something new here. So the 9th Circuit originally ruled "for" machine guns??? Color me shocked.
You are completely wrong here.
" M16 and the like " and " like the short-barrel shotgun in Miller "
This is exactly why the 9th concluded that concealed carry is not a right.
Right...And in a light that illustrates that it can be prohibited under the " 2nd Amendment and state analogues. "
Right...And with the blessing of Hellers historical analysis in a light that concealed carry can be prohibited under the " 2nd Amendment and state analogues."...Which is why they will not take Peruta for review.
Norman was actually damaged under Florida statute. If there is no personal damage to ones rights, the SCOTUS will not take the case. The only other actual damage while exercising ones right to self-defense was Caetano...And amazingly, the SCOTUS gave it review.
Actually, I never said " MA violated the 2A". That's right, MA can't use that analogy to prohibit an arm in common use...Not to difficult to read between the lines on this...Which means it's protected under the 2nd Amendment just like Scalia stated in Heller...." in common use " And stun-guns are in common use.
Peruta will get certiorari denied and Norman will get a grant.
It was, in US v Stewart in 2003. It was GVR'ed in light of Raich.
Wikipedia page on the case
If it is specific to handguns great.
If it's just arms then MD will argue it is already allowed with rifles and shotguns.
It would only suck till Marylanders got the balls to do it.Yep. The ruling that OC or CC must be allowed (with no distinction for handguns) would essentially mean the status quo for Marylanders. That would really suck.
It would only suck till Marylanders got the balls to do it.
Sent from the 3rd Rock
Now I'm genuinely curious. So what and where can a Virginian open carry in Maryland?
Not in today's orders list.
As the relists mount past 2 relists, the odds of a grant actually go down.... Note that the Court also declined to act on the petitions in Binderup. That's interesting.
As the relists mount past 2 relists, the odds of a grant actually go down.... Note that the Court also declined to act on the petitions in Binderup. That's interesting.
Unless Gorsuch is still not ready to take on the heavy petitions. Maybe they'll hold those until the long conference?
Maybe. No idea where Gorsuch stands on his preparation. He is known as a hard worker. It's a huge job he has, especially since he is not using the pool memo on petitions. That alone is a lot of extra work.
Could you explain the meaning of that to the legal layman?
Wikipdeia has a pretty good description https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cert_poolCould you explain the meaning of that to the legal layman?
Could you explain the meaning of that to the legal layman?