A Real "Smart" Gun

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • fred333

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Dec 20, 2013
    12,340
    Have any of the optics makers developed an optic containing a [remaining] round-count heads-up display (HUD)?

    It just occurred to me that with the recent proliferation of sidearm-mounted optics, we now have a "smart" way to remedy that age-old question: "How many shots do I have left?"
     

    erwos

    The Hebrew Hammer
    MDS Supporter
    Mar 25, 2009
    13,886
    Rockville, MD
    So, there's a few of technical problems to be solved to do what you're talking about:
    1. How to count the rounds in the mag?
    2. How to tell the optic that count?
    3. How to display that count in the optic?

    The first problem is tough on a rifle, but seemingly doable on a pistol - you'd have conductive points on the side of the magazine that are triggered by the follower, and some sort of circuitry to read those points to know how many rounds are left.

    The second problem is easy on a rifle - in a pinch, you could hard-wire it. You can't do that easily on a pistol because the slide is moving. That probably means wireless technology, which increases energy use by both the pistol and optic. Maybe something like active RFID could do it? You also have the possibility of jamming, albeit I doubt that's such a big deal in this context. And, oh, yeah, you need an industry standard for this. Good luck with that.

    The third issue is the hardest one to solve. To my knowledge, no reflex sights support a truly programmable display / reticle right now.

    IMHO, you'd be better off simplifying this issue, and simply having a red/green/yellow indicator on the beavertail showing whether your mag is empty/full/partially-full. That is probably within the capabilities of current technology, and would not result in bulking up the pistol so terribly much.
     

    -Z/28-

    I wanna go fast
    Dec 6, 2011
    10,661
    Harford Co
    So, there's a few of technical problems to be solved to do what you're talking about:
    1. How to count the rounds in the mag?
    2. How to tell the optic that count?
    3. How to display that count in the optic?

    The first problem is tough on a rifle, but seemingly doable on a pistol - you'd have conductive points on the side of the magazine that are triggered by the follower, and some sort of circuitry to read those points to know how many rounds are left.

    The second problem is easy on a rifle - in a pinch, you could hard-wire it. You can't do that easily on a pistol because the slide is moving. That probably means wireless technology, which increases energy use by both the pistol and optic. Maybe something like active RFID could do it? You also have the possibility of jamming, albeit I doubt that's such a big deal in this context. And, oh, yeah, you need an industry standard for this. Good luck with that.

    The third issue is the hardest one to solve. To my knowledge, no reflex sights support a truly programmable display / reticle right now.

    IMHO, you'd be better off simplifying this issue, and simply having a red/green/yellow indicator on the beavertail showing whether your mag is empty/full/partially-full. That is probably within the capabilities of current technology, and would not result in bulking up the pistol so terribly much.

    Instead of having a physical count of the rounds, why not just have it so you set the optic for how many rounds are in a mag for that firearm, and then it can count recoil impulses with a shock sensor of some sort. You press a reset button when you reload and it counts down as you fire.
     

    Melnic

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Dec 27, 2012
    15,364
    HoCo
    there are already training aids (MaintisX) that has a built in accelerometer to measure recoil. It could couple sound with recoil for more reliability.
    Resetting with a mag fill could be manual but a better way would be automatic somehow.

    Visual indicator showing say last 3 rounds is a good idea. Most people can count to 3. well, most people on this forum that is.

    What ever you do, it can't mess with the reliability of the firearm, shoving electronics into the working parts of a firearm I think is not such a good idea without extreme testing. Doing that is not likely to make the firearm more reliable and thus not good.

    Edit: found this
    http://ch00ftech.com/2011/11/15/the-bullet-counter/
    https://adsinc.com/latest-round-counter-tech-secubit/
     

    erwos

    The Hebrew Hammer
    MDS Supporter
    Mar 25, 2009
    13,886
    Rockville, MD
    Instead of having a physical count of the rounds, why not just have it so you set the optic for how many rounds are in a mag for that firearm, and then it can count recoil impulses with a shock sensor of some sort. You press a reset button when you reload and it counts down as you fire.
    Two problems:
    1. If you don't load your magazines to full capacity - user error, perhaps - you wouldn't have an accurate round count. Also wouldn't work if you had to use partially loaded mags late in the game - which is exactly the time when you want a round count that's physically accurate.
    2. "Press a reset button while reloading" is flatly unacceptable for a combat firearm. One more thing that could go wrong.
     

    outrider58

    Eats Bacon Raw
    MDS Supporter
    Jul 29, 2014
    50,029
    Two problems:
    1. If you don't load your magazines to full capacity - user error, perhaps - you wouldn't have an accurate round count. Also wouldn't work if you had to use partially loaded mags late in the game - which is exactly the time when you want a round count that's physically accurate.
    2. "Press a reset button while reloading" is flatly unacceptable for a combat firearm. One more thing that could go wrong.

    These are minor issues that can be over come in the software. Load your mags to full capacity. No reason not to. Set up-Mag capacity(30-40-100). It will automatically reset after the inumetated impulses. Include a reset button. Not perfect, but don't let perfect be the killer of good. Of course, you get in a gnarly running gunfight, you will be more than likely paying attention to more pressing matters.
     

    fred333

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Dec 20, 2013
    12,340
    Unless I'm missing something, it'd seem relatively simple to install a thin, flat pressure-sensitive sensor along the side of a magazine that produces a voltage based on the location of pressure. When fully loaded, the voltage would be at one end of the scale, indicating a full complement of cartridges in the HUD. Then, as rounds leave the magazine, the voltage drops to produce a descending readout in the HUD.
    Is it possible that, with all the electronic wizardry in play today, no one's done this yet?
     

    ADR

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 17, 2011
    4,171
    Unreliable, expensive, fragile, untrustworthy, and a waste of time.

    Who's going to trust a round remaining counter on a rifle? Most likely the type of person who will never actually have to use one.
     

    fred333

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Dec 20, 2013
    12,340
    A mag window works pretty well and doesn't need any batteries.

    Where's the window?
    Glock-19-9mm_main-1.jpg
     

    Attachments

    • Imagine a sight picture like this.jpg
      Imagine a sight picture like this.jpg
      31.7 KB · Views: 84

    photoracer

    Competition Shooter
    Oct 22, 2010
    3,318
    West Virginia
    This is like all those new automobile features coming out that are for "safety" when in reality they are just for the fact that drivers are actually getting worse at it. Same with shooting. If you can't count rounds, and admittedly many can't, maybe this is just not your hobby. On the other hand the gun-control nuts are actually helping people. Its easier to count 7-10 rounds than it is 17-30 rounds.:lol2:

    And as for the electronic counter in the Colonial Marines M41A Pulse Rifle, when would a Marine actually look at the mag count?
    Correct when the shooting stopped. Anything that takes your concentration off shooting the bad guys is done when they are all dead or not returning fire. Then is when you check and top off.
     

    Alan3413

    Ultimate Member
    Mar 4, 2013
    17,163
    Where's the window?
    Glock-19-9mm_main-1.jpg

    Hmm.. was thinking more about an AR.

    My Glock only has a laser, so a red dot counter won't do anything for me.

    Having said that, should be straightforward to make a fairly reliable counter. A shot is a sharp back and forth of the slide. Reset is slide slamming forward.
     

    AlBeight

    Member
    MDS Supporter
    Mar 30, 2017
    4,500
    Hampstead
    My cell phone has a step counter to track how much I walk each day. This app replaced the little plastic POS one I bought for $10 that I used to tie to my shoestrings. This technology, though it baffles the heck outta me, seems like it already exists in a realtime application. Some enterprising folks could probably do this fairly easily.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,528
    Messages
    7,285,117
    Members
    33,473
    Latest member
    Sarca

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom