This thread needs more wood
That desperately needs a violin case.
Awesome.
This thread needs more wood
This thread needs more wood
Nice Brian
That desperately needs a violin case.
Awesome.
This thread needs more wood
This thread needs more wood
Very nice wood Brian!!!
Here's mine. The wood is not as nice....but she's 75+ years old and has probably at times been ridden hard and put away wet.
Sadly the MD state government made binary triggers illegal. It certainly saved the class 3 values from going in the trash.
Nice.4 Stamp Range day at AGC yesterday.
Nice.
Question though, did you remove the iron sights from the ACOG and then put a secondary optic on there?
I might be kind of in awe of that.
Makes sense. ACOGs simple to adjust at the range, not so much in the field.That gun is chambered in 300 Blackout. The ACOG is zeroed for supersonic bullets, and the offset Aimpoint is zeroed for subsonics. It is much easier (for me) to use two optics with independent zeros instead of dialing a scope to account for the difference between supers and subs. [/url]
Had no idea they made one with sight bosses but no sights!This particular ACOG did not come with irons https://www.trijicon.com/na_en/products/product3.php?pid=TA01LAW
Awww, gee. In all seriousness though please remember that I'm just an interested lay person here.
That said:
Correct. You are doing what ATF refers to as "making" a new firearm when you use an approved Form 1 to convert something from a Title I (non-NFA) firearm into a Title II (NFA) firearm.
In addition to that, it is my opinion (and that of MSP and ATF) that SBRs do fall under the rules in FSA2013. This is because they are still "Short Barreled Rifles. To use an AR SBR for an example, it is still a "semi-automatic centerfire rifle which is capable of accepting detachable magazines" and so it must pass all of the copycat tests in FSA2013, including the 29" rule, the feature test, etc.
This is why ATF will not currently approve a Form 1 for a Maryland resident for an AR which lists an OAL shorter than 29" - because MSP has told them that would be illegal here, as it would be a non-grandfathered (since you're making a new firearm when you complete it) "assault weapon" (because it fails the OAL test) and therefore banned. Likewise, if you wanted to make a new SBR post 10/1/13 that would fail the "evil feature" test (like having a flash hider and a folding stock) that would also be illegal.
If that's true, why is a full size AK 47 illegal in MD, but a SBR version of the same gun legal?
I was under the impression that in MD, a SBR was viewed as a pistol and therefore didn't have to comply with any of the rules rifles had to. Fed saw it as a rifle and MD saw it as a pistol. Obviously the overall length requirement goes against what I'm saying, but that's only because MD is retarded.
that's only because the MSP are retarded.
Newest member of the family. Colt Commercial 1917 Model 1928 in U.S. Cal 30.