esqappellate
President, MSI
- Feb 12, 2012
- 7,408
ACTION ALERT!
- Thread starter esqappellate
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
Email sent. Kept it cool and concise.
iH8DemLibz
When All Else Fails.
Thanks and Done.
cms1528
Active Member
- Feb 26, 2013
- 802
Emails sent.
I imagine we will see SWAT teams kicking in doors to serve this type of order. Uniform officers will likely not serve this type of order without the extra force considering they are confronting a likely armed environment and people/person not happy about surrendering their legally owned firearms. A situation like this could escalate merely by the presence of force. Imagine the potential loss of life and property based on the meritless claims of another.
I imagine we will see SWAT teams kicking in doors to serve this type of order. Uniform officers will likely not serve this type of order without the extra force considering they are confronting a likely armed environment and people/person not happy about surrendering their legally owned firearms. A situation like this could escalate merely by the presence of force. Imagine the potential loss of life and property based on the meritless claims of another.
buellsfurn
Ultimate Member
iH8DemLibz
When All Else Fails.
The politicians that wrote this bill would like nothing more than for gun owners to kill police officers that were serving arrest warrants and seizing firearms and ammunition.
The Left could scream, SEE, we told you guns and gun owners were dangerous.
It would lay the groundwork for more extreme forms of gun control and confiscation.
knastera
Just another shooter
Even my mother, who is a liberal, realizes how bad this is. I read through the proposed amendments. They rejected the idea of having a medical professional required to testify as to the mental state of the individual in question. At least that would have given us a degree of due process.
knastera
Just another shooter
I saw a picture of a confiscation in Oregon. There must have been ten SWAT officers with rifles at the ready. The victim was a man that was legally open carrying (it was legal in his municipality) a 25 ACP pistol. His "crime" was looking into store windows while carrying.
esqappellate
President, MSI
- Feb 12, 2012
- 7,408
Citation? Link?
knastera
Just another shooter
Sent an email to Hogan's office. Will call tomorrow. I wonder if they cross reference contacts with the list of those who've donated to his campaign?
You mean this gentleman? https://www.seattletimes.com/seattl...belltown-under-extreme-risk-protection-order/
No, no it seems like that was a pretty legit seizure of his handgun.
ERPOs will absolutely be abused, but the case cited is actually a really good reason to have them. It is just in that one case, it wasn’t abused.
j_h_smith
Ultimate Member
- Jul 28, 2007
- 28,516
I've been emailing/calling everyone I can imagine for the last few days. Hogan got emails and a phone call today.
Beach Runner
Member
- Mar 20, 2018
- 90
Emails sent expressing that this cannot be due process if the respondent is not allowed to present, and have considered, their relevant evidence. I am afraid some of my representatives with a D after their name will not consider my emails, but maybe some R's will not sell us out this time. Unfortunately, I am not sure Hogan will use the veto no matter how hard we point out the problems with this bill.
Emails sent expressing that this cannot be due process if the respondent is not allowed to present, and have considered, their relevant evidence. I am afraid some of my representatives with a D after their name will not consider my emails, but maybe some R's will not sell us out this time. Unfortunately, I am not sure Hogan will use the veto no matter how hard we point out the problems with this bill.
Sadly Im pretty sure he WILL NOT veto this bill. The dems would like him to which is the reason he wont.
Maybe there will be some successful legal challenges to the bill. Who knows.
At this point I’m hoping that if he is re-elected at least he can redraw the election districts and maybe we can boot some of these losers out.
Emails on the way....
Done here as well. I hope someone who is affected by this bill brings a lawsuit and sues the crap out of MD...The DemoRats do not care about the little people. If Miller and Bush are pushing hard then IMHO, their is someone above them that might dirt on them telling them what to do. I would not be surprised if our very anti 2A Frosh had and or has a hand in this...
pcfixer
Ultimate Member
Frederick county delegates sent email today with your findings. Yes, Tyranny is abound.
https://www.marylandshallissue.org/...so-called-extreme-risk-protection-orders-bill
Plato Got It Right. Tyranny is a Product of Extreme Inequality and Plutocratic Oligarchy
https://www.marylandshallissue.org/...so-called-extreme-risk-protection-orders-bill
Plato Got It Right. Tyranny is a Product of Extreme Inequality and Plutocratic Oligarchy
ToBeFree
Ultimate Member
Thanks
Sent to legislators.
Sent to legislators.
Users who are viewing this thread
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
-
-
-
-
‘Why is nothing being done?’: Concerns grow about drug use, fighting in Montgomery Co. school bathrooms (3 Viewers)
- Started by RFBfromDE
- Replies: 10
-
-
