alucard0822
For great Justice
I think the most amazing thing about the wikileaks/e-mails was that judging by all the polling data they DIDN'T change anything. Pretty much the only Clinton scandal that moved the polls was Clinton dropping at the speech, getting dragged off to the van, and the obvious BS coverup, which didn't involve a hack at all. So far nobody has disputed that any leaked e-mail is authentic, that the Barry-O admin, DNC and Clinton campaign are probably the most hateful, dishonest, corrupt, and criminal group to ever find themselves at the top of the political ladder in the US. The only thing the band of proven liars has to say in their defense is that those e-mails were illegally obtained by Russia, with nothing other than conjecture as "proof".
If there is proof, then present it to congress, and let them do their job to hold investigative hearings, pass bills and make sure it doesn't happen again, but the administration and their agencies refuse to present any proof. IMO doesn't matter much who exposed the e-mails, although should have been the US media, but they were part of the corruption. If Russia was behind the hack, figured Americans would witness proof of criminal corruption, and overwhelmingly elect the more favorable candidate, it seems their only error was over-estimating the integrity of Americans, and under estimating the level of corruption we have come to expect from our politicians. Might be Russia, might be someone else, the only real lesson to come out of it was that when a political party and their presidential nominee is exposed for massive corruption, nobody really cares.
If there is proof, then present it to congress, and let them do their job to hold investigative hearings, pass bills and make sure it doesn't happen again, but the administration and their agencies refuse to present any proof. IMO doesn't matter much who exposed the e-mails, although should have been the US media, but they were part of the corruption. If Russia was behind the hack, figured Americans would witness proof of criminal corruption, and overwhelmingly elect the more favorable candidate, it seems their only error was over-estimating the integrity of Americans, and under estimating the level of corruption we have come to expect from our politicians. Might be Russia, might be someone else, the only real lesson to come out of it was that when a political party and their presidential nominee is exposed for massive corruption, nobody really cares.