Different load data in Hornady vs Lyman books

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Swaim13

    Active Member
    Jun 11, 2017
    337
    I have a Lyman and a Hornady reloading book. I am typically reloading 223 and noticed the the two books do not line up with the powder loads at all. I am specifically looking at the 75 gr BTHP round utilizing Varget powder. The Hornady book indicates a starting load of 19.4 gr and a max of 23.5 gr and a max velocity of 2600 fps. The Lyman book indicates a starting load of 23.0 gr and a max of 25.6 gr with a max velocity of 2843 fps. The only difference that I can see between the loads is the primers. The Lyman book uses Remington 7.5 primers and the Hornady uses WSR primers.

    I also know that Hornady makes match grade cartridges which have a muzzle velocity of 2790 fps but I am not sure what powder is being used.

    I noticed similar trends in a few other calibers and loads. Is the Hornady book just being conservative? Am I missing something in particular? Is it safe to use the Lyman numbers if I build up to them?
     

    BradMacc82

    Ultimate Member
    Industry Partner
    Aug 17, 2011
    26,177
    You also need to look at what type of firearm/receiver was used to develop the listed data. Lyman's 49th shows a Universal receiver with a 24" 1:12 barrel is used for pressure/velocity, but a 20" Colt with a 1:7 barrel was also used for the heavier rounds.

    As always, you build up. Sometimes the listed data just isn't going to be feasible in a particular firearm/configuration. Example, the listed max load data for a 60gr Vmax in a .223 using H335 - great in a 24" bolt gun, a disaster in a 16" AR (mid-length gas).
     
    Last edited:

    Melnic

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Dec 27, 2012
    15,372
    HoCo
    It is not unusual to see differences but that is pretty severe compared to things I've seen. You may also see changes in different revisions of the same reloading manual.
    Look at the Hodgdon reloading data center on the website.
    They show 22.5 - 25 (compressed) for 75gr bullets

    I"ve found the Hodgdon site to be pretty darn close and at least gives me accurate starting loads. I recall 69g bthp would compress for me around 25.5gr of Varget
     

    Doco Overboard

    Ultimate Member
    You also need to look at what type of firearm/receiver was used to develop the listed data. Lyman's 49th shows a Universal receiver with a 24" 1:12 barrel is used for pressure/velocity, but a 20" Colt with a 1:7 barrel was also used for the heavier rounds.

    As always, you build up. Sometimes the listed data just isn't going to be feasible in a particular firearm/configuration. Example, the listed max load data for a 60gr Vmax in a .223 using H335 - great in a 24" bolt gun, a disaster in a 16" AR (mid-length gas).

    Thats exactly right. Thats why you always start with a minimum load and the reasons are usually stated in the forward section. And or reduce charges a few percent when components are being substituted or changed. One firearm manufactured exactly after the first could react substantially different with even a starting load.
    Factory powders are manufactured in bulk and are blended sometimes from entirely different chemicals to provide uniform ballistics throughout many lots/production runs. Some of these are trade secrets. Trying to imitate factory velocities from canister powders is hard to do not to mention that max velocity loads are not always the most consistent or accurate.
    They can even be unsafe when used in arms that the load was not originally developed in.
     

    Pinecone

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Feb 4, 2013
    28,175
    Yeap, any change, changes things. :)

    Change of firearm (chamber dimensions) or primer even.


    Which is why you ALWAYS start with a reduced load and work up. And the Max in the book is not necessarily the Max in YOUR firearm. Your Max may be higher or lower than the book.

    The OCW method of working up loads takes this into account, but making small powder changes, such that if x load is not showing pressure signs, x+1 will not harm the firearm (especially for the on or two rounds fired). And you may be able to work up beyond the book Max. BUT, only for THAT rifle.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,561
    Messages
    7,286,472
    Members
    33,477
    Latest member
    adamc904

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom