Mack C-85
R.I.P.
Recently this letter to the editor was published in The Capital:
Today they published my letter:
The NRA
Much as I hate to admit it, I find it impossible to disagree with the National Rifle Association after reflecting upon the ugly assassination of five policemen in Dallas.
If you will allow me, please, to suggest a probable explanation of this tragic event as the NRA might explain it (if, of course, it chooses to offer an explanation), it will undoubtedly sound a bit like:
"If these five brave officers had been permitted by law to possess and openly carry firearms and had been trained in how to personally defend themselves, the outcome would have been quite different. More likely, there would have been five uninjured police officers and one would-be assassin with a belly full of lead."
In other words, it is the message that the NRA has been trying to teach American all along: that the answer to gun killings will always be more guns.
I expect it is the NRA's traditional wish not to get involved that keeps it from trying to personally trade on this national tragedy.
PETER J. LARSON
Annapolis
Today they published my letter:
The Capital's letters policy clearly states that the newspaper "does not publish letters that are libelous or in bad taste." However, you had no problem publishing Peter J. Larson's letter, "The NRA" (The Capital, July 27).
Not only were the heroic officers in Dallas "armed and openly carrying," but they were most likely trained by several of the National Rifle Association's over 13,000 certified law enforcement instructors.
It's typical of The Capital: Facts don't matter if they don't fit the mainstream media's agenda.
GEORGE R CROSBY
Severn