Which extends to their editorial this morning. It reads like she wrote it and then their crappy editor dialed the batsh*t crazy down a notch or two. Has all her talking points though.
...“No right is 100% not removable — none. The right to life is not unremovable — the courts take it away in parts of the county, cops take it away. The right to liberty is not unremovable — the courts take it away, cops take it away,” Altomare said. “The right to carry a gun is not unremovable.”
As Altomare spoke, he reminded the audience several times — “You don’t know my politics.”...
Love it! "Inalienable" doesn't mean that. "Shall not be infringed" doesn't mean that.
Yes, Chief, we know your politics.
Chief Altomare, the right-removal isn't the default setting of the US Constitution. It's only removed after accusal, due-process, conviction, and ultimately exhaustion of appeals (i.e. "more due process.") And the right - freedom, property, liberty, life - is only removed in response to some action ... which usually deprived someone else of their rights to same.'This ain?t that?: Anne Arundel Police Chief Timothy Altomare responds to 2nd Amendment criticisms at final gun task force town hall
http://www.baltimoresun.com/politic...0200216-t4lq7vl4czdmpec5seorwlqjdy-story.html
Now we know......“No right is 100% not removable — none. The right to life is not unremovable — the courts take it away in parts of the county, cops take it away. The right to liberty is not unremovable — the courts take it away, cops take it away,” Altomare said. “The right to carry a gun is not unremovable.”
As Altomare spoke, he reminded the audience several times — “You don’t know my politics.”...
Chief Altomare, the right-removal isn't the default setting of the US Constitution. It's only removed after accusal, due-process, conviction, and ultimately exhaustion of appeals (i.e. "more due process.") And the right - freedom, property, liberty, life - is only removed in response to some action ... which usually deprived someone else of their rights to same.