Zorros
Ultimate Member
Anyonr here cc the sig 239 in 357 sig? Anyone care to compare it for cc to the glock 33. I am thinking a bit of the sig. pros da/sa. Cons 7 oz heavier than glock, having to buy it when i have a perfectly good glock.
While Sig may have discontinued certain handguns most parts are still available at Top Gun Supply. They have tons of parts. I have owned Sigs for many years, my oldest is a P-228 1991 vintage with somewhere around 20K down the tube (it's my carry/match/training go to) and other then every ten thousand rounds back to Sig for new springs and going over zero parts have ever failed. The only Sig I own that has no support from Sig for extras barrels/parts is my 556xi, they put MDX as their main rifle of the modular type. I bet my life on a Sig everyday. Chris
Not magazines! And while the .357/.40 mags 're still somewhat easy to find, 9mm 239 mags are fetching $70+ on the secondary market. I'm sure it won't be long before the .357/.40 mags are equally rare.
If you are looking for magazines at a fair price look at SigForum. Sig owners from all over the world will sell there. P-239 magazines are on there on a regular basis. Chris
I cc'd the P239 in 357SIG for several years when I was LE as it was my agency approved/registered off-duty carry piece and we didn't have many other approved options at the time. Con, as you mentioned, it's heavy. Pretty limited round count for its size/weight when comparing to other options like Glocks. Pro for me at least, it has a very natural point of aim and I was always very accurate with it. Very pleasant gun to shoot and manageable recoil due to its weight (I carried it with the hogue wraparound grips). Haven't ever had a single malfunction of any type in mine with probably 2500ish rounds though it, so it's been very reliable. That said, I very rarely carry it anymore. Personally I just don't like the extra weight and will carry my G43 or G36 or even G19 instead.