Thank you for those links.
Supreme Court Takes Major NRA Second Amendment Case from New York
- Thread starter Bigfoot21075
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
Thank you for those links.
Well well well I wonder if the top brass at NYC and mabe the very anti Ag's of kommi kali, Non free state md, rotten NJ and stupid como of nystate plus conn are wondering what if the mentions that G&S is unconstitutional the scotus agrees with him plus all the other stupid laws they had as well.
If good & sufficient becomes unconstitutional (eg, if subjectiveness is removed from the licensing process), how might that affect national reciprocity?
delaware_export
Ultimate Member
- Apr 10, 2018
- 3,207
imho, any state that says g&s for it's own citizens now, should a court decide that's unconstitutional, will still deny non residents the right to carry there.
their logic would be, "we MUST give to our own citizens the right, but we'll be damned if we'll give them to anyone else."
just like speech, religion, searching, imprisonment, and such things, the right to carry only applies in your own state. if you're visiting another state, you give those rights up.
and lest someone miss it... /sarc...
their logic would be, "we MUST give to our own citizens the right, but we'll be damned if we'll give them to anyone else."
just like speech, religion, searching, imprisonment, and such things, the right to carry only applies in your own state. if you're visiting another state, you give those rights up.
and lest someone miss it... /sarc...
Kharn
Ultimate Member
Thankfully, that would fall under Hicklin v Orbeck (1978) and Supreme Court of New Hampshire v Piper (1985), where the state must show that the non-residents are "a peculiar source of the evil," and the statute must be narrowly tailored against their misdeeds (Hicklin), so if carry were found a right, those that do not issue to non-residents would get the smackdown very quickly.
I think the best way to get their is take metro and get off at Union Station and walk to SCOTUS which is about mabe 1/4 to 1/2 mile away. That way you do not have to worry about parking in downtown dc. I plan to leave here around 6:30am and I know I will have to do some waiting and hopes it does not rain that day..
Kharn
Ultimate Member
For a BOR case like this, you'll need to be there earlier to get a seat in the gallery for the entire argument. The law school students will crowd you out. There are only 50 seats for the entire argument and 30 3-minute-interval rotating seats IIRC.
4am via Uber would be better, the first Metro was too late for McDonald for me.
Sorry but I found this part comical.
So .... hoping for an answer on this one in June 2020? Eventually the meaning of the COTUS will be defined by our current SCOTUS. Wow, this has been debated for many years now, reminds me of Pelosi saying "we must pass it to find out what is in it." ... a country still trying to figure it out.
Don't quote me so I can delete the post, doesn't sound good after reading it but 1A, "if you can keep it" - Franklin.
Kharn
Ultimate Member
Since the Solicitor General has been allocated argument time, will they now file a brief on the merits? Their last brief was at the cert stage in May.
jcutonilli
Ultimate Member
- Mar 28, 2013
- 2,474
I think you need to look at the dates again.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/18-280.html
The cert stage briefs were due on 9 Oct 2018 for those supporting the petitioners and the case was granted cert on 22 Jan 2019. The brief submitted by the Solicitor General on 14 May 2019 was a brief on the merits.
Pope414
Active Member
IMHO i think the Solicitor General`s request for time is a good thing . The Trump Admin. has stated it`s pro-2A also it is for an originalists interpretation of the Bill of Rights..... So if he states Heller as an affirm on the right to "bear arms" that's good. also I think Noel Fransisco might still be a tad salty after the left torpedoed his SCOTUS nom. back in the day along with their letter threatening the court.
Probably would give a big push in Congress to finally get this done. But I don't think SCOTUS would rule a state had to recognize another's so long as their permit was available to non-residents.
whistlersmother
Peace through strength
I don't have to get a non-resident driver's license. Is that a state thing or a federal mandate thing?
State thing - Drivers License Compact - https://ballotpedia.org/Driver_License_Compact and https://www.aamva.org/Drivers-License-Compacts/
Enabled by congressional consent in 1958.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
Blacksmith101
Grumpy Old Man
- Jun 22, 2012
- 22,259
So theoretically five states, who are not members, could stop you at the state line and say you cant drive in this state without a license issued by them.
Fox123
Ultimate Member
What about marriage licenses?
If all you have to do is move to another state instead of getting divorced?
You can see other people while on vacation?
If all you have to do is move to another state instead of getting divorced?
You can see other people while on vacation?
At least on your last, states like countries can control their citizens behavior when not at home. Thus if your state makes infidelity a crime, Doesn’t matter if you are in your home state when it happens. US criminalizes underage sex out of the US.
Pope414
Active Member
just like clockwork
you can almost set your timepiece to it...just before a big 2A case we get a mass shooting...2 weeks from orals .... i pray for all the victims...amazing how this always happens
you can almost set your timepiece to it...just before a big 2A case we get a mass shooting...2 weeks from orals .... i pray for all the victims...amazing how this always happens
NFS!
wjackcooper
Active Member
- Feb 9, 2011
- 689
Solicitor General (Trump appointee) supports NRA’s argument:
NYSRPA v NYC SCOTUS case / breaking news: The United States government takes the official position that the case is NOT moot!
!https://supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/1...20 views.pdf https://supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/1...20 views.pdf
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/18/18-280/122653/20191115171839625_Letter 18-280 views.pdf
Regards
Jack
One of the links ought to work.
NYSRPA v NYC SCOTUS case / breaking news: The United States government takes the official position that the case is NOT moot!
!https://supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/1...20 views.pdf https://supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/1...20 views.pdf
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/18/18-280/122653/20191115171839625_Letter 18-280 views.pdf
Regards
Jack
One of the links ought to work.
Last edited:
Users who are viewing this thread
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
-
-
-
-
-
The Nation's Gun Show in Chantilly, VA April 19-21 (5 Viewers)- Started by Aamdskeetshooter
- Replies: 1
-
