En banc Decision in Peruta -- a loss

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • esqappellate

    President, MSI
    Feb 12, 2012
    7,408
    Unless of course, the 4 liberals don't want to allow the other 4 to wait for Gorsuch to be seated.

    There is a common law of collegiality among Justices not to play such games. Basically everyone on the court know what goes around comes around. None of the liberals on the court and none of the conservatives on the court are overtly partisan like that. Harry Reid they are not.
     

    krucam

    Ultimate Member
    Now listed as "Rescheduled" on the Supreme Court website.

    Good!

    https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docketfiles/16-894.htm

    No. 16-894
    Title:
    Edward Peruta, et al., Petitioners
    v.
    California, et al.
    Docketed: January 17, 2017
    Linked with 16A440
    Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    Case Nos.: (10-56971)
    Decision Date: June 9, 2016
    Rehearing Denied: August 15, 2016

    ~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Oct 31 2016 Application (16A440) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 13, 2016 to December 14, 2016, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
    Dec 2 2016 Application (16A440) to extend further the time from December 14, 2016 to January 12, 2017, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
    Dec 5 2016 Application (16A440) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until January 12, 2017.
    Jan 12 2017 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 16, 2017)
    Jan 26 2017 Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel petitioners.
    Jan 27 2017 Letter received from counsel for respondent.
    Feb 6 2017 Consent the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for respondents Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., et al..
    Feb 15 2017 Brief amicus curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence filed.
    Feb 16 2017 Brief amicus curiae of National Rifle Association of America, Inc. filed.
    Feb 16 2017 Brief amici curiae of Western States Sheriffs' Association, et al. filed.
    Feb 16 2017 Brief of respondent California in opposition filed.
    Feb 16 2017 Brief of respondents County of Yolo and Sheriff Ed Prieto in opposition filed.
    Feb 16 2017 Brief amici curiae of Alabama and 25 other States filed.
    Feb 16 2017 Brief amici curiae of The Governors of Texas, et al. filed.
    Feb 16 2017 Brief amici curiae of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc., et al. filed.
    Feb 16 2017 Brief amici curiae of Gun Owners of America, Inc., et al. filed.
    Mar 7 2017 Reply of petitioners Edward Peruta, et al. filed.
    Mar 8 2017 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 24, 2017.
    Mar 23 2017 Rescheduled.
     

    krucam

    Ultimate Member
    Hmmm....

    Gotta wonder when it'll come up again.

    There's another conference next Friday 3/31. The docket should reflect "Distributed for Conference..." soon if that's going to be the next possible one.

    I honestly thought this would have been 'Relisted' from today's conference, but it went into 'Rescheduled' yesterday without making it into the Conference.
     

    esqappellate

    President, MSI
    Feb 12, 2012
    7,408
    lol, Dan used the banana ... this has to be somewhat positive news.

    Agreed. And I think it likely that they will wait to see whether Gorsuch is confirmed and, if confirmed, they will relist it for his consideration. That decision on his nomination will be in April, so it is very soon. This is working out very nicely. Of course, that does not mean that cert. will be granted. But it looks like a shot now. Before anyone gets their hopes up, don't forget that Gorsuch is a replacement for Scalia, not Kennedy and the Court has already denied cert on this issue 3 times with Scalia on the Court. This is still a long, long shot.
     

    GlocksAndPatriots

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Aug 29, 2016
    763
    Agreed. And I think it likely that they will wait to see whether Gorsuch is confirmed and, if confirmed, they will relist it for his consideration. That decision on his nomination will be in April, so it is very soon. This is working out very nicely. Of course, that does not mean that cert. will be granted. But it looks like a shot now. Before anyone gets their hopes up, don't forget that Gorsuch is a replacement for Scalia, not Kennedy and the Court has already denied cert on this issue 3 times with Scalia on the Court. This is still a long, long shot.

    Does it make me a bad person to pray each morning for Ginsburg and Kennedy to have a heart attack?
     

    press1280

    Ultimate Member
    Jun 11, 2010
    7,916
    WV
    What's the difference between rescheduled and resisted?
    Does this basically mean they are waiting for Gorsuch on this case?
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,504
    Messages
    7,284,363
    Members
    33,471
    Latest member
    Ababe1120

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom