DanGuy48
Ultimate Member
I’m not trying to start a debate about the pros and cons of the NRA, some like them, some don’t. I strongly prefer any discussion in this thread not go that direction.
I know that in bringing court cases there is the issue of whether the person (or entity?) bringing the case has standing to do so. My understanding (IANAL) is that this means whoever is bringing the case needs to have a claim that they are directly impacted by the issue being challenged.
So, can the NRA file cases against perceived U.S. constitutional violations in a state without someone from that state being represented in that case and claiming that they are being harmed?
I know that in bringing court cases there is the issue of whether the person (or entity?) bringing the case has standing to do so. My understanding (IANAL) is that this means whoever is bringing the case needs to have a claim that they are directly impacted by the issue being challenged.
So, can the NRA file cases against perceived U.S. constitutional violations in a state without someone from that state being represented in that case and claiming that they are being harmed?