danb
dont be a dumbass
The difference is the intent to manufacture a new one from different set of parts with a higher capacity. Before an anti-gun judge and jury, it's a solid win.
Legality of Mag Extension
- Thread starter Ammo Jon
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
The difference is the intent to manufacture a new one from different set of parts with a higher capacity. Before an anti-gun judge and jury, it's a solid win.
Zorros
Ultimate Member
I’d like you on extension retainer
I work for a box a month. Cheap.
Ammo Jon
Ultimate Member
- Mar 3, 2008
- 21,031
I’d like you on extension retainer
Sounds like a binding agreement
...and witnessed
I figured if someone really wanted to be a prick about it, they could try to get you on reassembly after cleaning...or, if you have spare parts or don't reassemble, then is it constructive intent
Look at how we jumped on the fools whose intent was to destroy their AR, and ended up creating an unregistered single shot SBR.
My official policy is just not to clean
Users who are viewing this thread
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
3rd Circuit Case - Range v Atty General Non-Violent Misdemeanor as a Prohibitor (5 Viewers)- Latest: Boats
