Go Back   Maryland Shooters > Gun Rights and Legislation > National 2A Issues
Don't Have An Account? Register Here

Join MD Shooters

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old December 19th, 2018, 06:33 AM #1
Bigfoot21075 Bigfoot21075 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Elkridge, MD
Posts: 1,199
Bigfoot21075 Bigfoot21075 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Elkridge, MD
Posts: 1,199
BREAKING: Federal Lawsuit Filed Challenging Trump Bump-Stock Ban; Injunction Sought

BREAKING: Federal Lawsuit Filed Challenging Trump Bump-Stock Ban; Injunction Sought

https://globenewswire.com/news-relea...on-Sought.html

Washington, D.C., Dec. 18, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Today, attorneys for an owner of a “bump-stock” device and three constitutional rights advocacy organizations filed a federal lawsuit against the Trump Administration’s new confiscatory ban on firearm parts, additionally challenging Matthew Whitaker’s legal authority to serve as Acting Attorney General and issue rules without being nominated to the role and confirmed by the Senate or by operation of law. A copy of the court filings can be viewed at www.bumpstockcase.com.

The plaintiffs also filed a motion seeking a temporary injunction to prevent the Trump Administration from implementing and enforcing the new regulation. The lawsuit, captioned as Guedes, et al. v. BATFE, et al., is backed by Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC), Firearms Policy Foundation (FPF), and Madison Society Foundation (MSF), also institutional plaintiffs in the case.

“Bump-stocks” were legal under federal law and prior determinations of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives until the agency issued a new final rulemaking today. Under the new rule, owners of the devices have just 90 days to surrender or destroy their property, after which they could face federal ‘machinegun’ charges that carry up to 10 years in prison and $250,000 in fines for each violation.

The plaintiffs are represented by attorneys Joshua Prince and Adam Kraut of Firearms Industry Consulting Group, a division of Civil Rights Defense Firm, P.C. Prince and Kraut previously filed a nearly 1,000-page formal opposition to the proposed regulation, which included a video exhibit showing the actual operation of a “bump-stock” device on an AR-15 type firearm. That opposition and its 35 exhibits can be viewed at www.bit.ly/fpc-bumpstock-reg-opposition.

“The ATF has misled the public about bump-stock devices,” Prince said. “Worse, they are actively attempting to make felons out of people who relied on their legal opinions to lawfully acquire and possess devices the government unilaterally, unconstitutionally, and improperly decided to reclassify as ‘machineguns’. We are optimistic that the court will act swiftly to protect the rights and property of Americans who own these devices, and once the matter has been fully briefed and considered by the court, that the regulation will be struck down permanently.”

In a January statement, Firearms Policy Coalition said that the federal “DOJ and BATFE clearly lack the statutory authority to re-define the targeted devices as ‘machineguns.’” Following that, in February, FPC also commented that as they “opposed the lawless manner in which President Obama often ruled by ‘pen-and-a-phone’ executive fiat,” they objected to and would fight “President Trump’s outrageous lawlessness here.”

“In its rulemaking, the Trump Administration is attempting to abuse the system, ignore the statutes passed by the Congress, and thumb its nose at the Constitution without regard to the liberty and property rights of Americans. That is unacceptable and dangerous,” explained Adam Kraut, an attorney for the plaintiffs. “It is beyond comprehension that the government would seek establish a precedent that it can arbitrarily redefine terms and subject thousands of people to serious criminal liability and the loss of property.”

Anyone who owns a “bump-stock” device and who would like to consider participating in the case should contact the FPC/FPF Legal Action Hotline at https://www.firearmspolicy.org/hotline or (855) 252-4510 (available 24/7/365) as soon as possible.

Firearms Policy Coalition (www.firearmspolicy.org) is a 501(c)4 grassroots nonprofit organization. FPC’s mission is to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, especially the fundamental, individual Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.

Firearms Policy Foundation (www.firearmsfoundation.org) is a 501(c)3 grassroots nonprofit organization. FPF’s mission is to defend the Constitution of the United States and the People’s rights, privileges and immunities deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition, especially the inalienable, fundamental, and individual right to keep and bear arms.

Madison Society Foundation (www.madison-society.org) is a 501(c)(3) grassroots nonprofit based in California. It promotes and preserves the purposes of the Constitution of the United States, in particular the right to keep and bear arms. MSF provides the general public and its members with education and training on this important right.

__________________
"The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." -- (Thomas Jefferson)
Bigfoot21075 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 19th, 2018, 06:39 AM #2
ToolAA's Avatar
ToolAA ToolAA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Ellicott City
Posts: 3,920
ToolAA ToolAA is offline
Senior Member
ToolAA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Ellicott City
Posts: 3,920
So lets see how this plays out. Just about every thing the Administration has tried to do has been blocked in the courts.

What are the odds that they say this rule change is ok.
__________________
Honorable people with a good work ethic and strong character have shaped our communities and nation more so than presidents and congressmen. The crisis of character we see in our political leaders is a symptom of our nation's sickness not the cause for the disease.
ToolAA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 19th, 2018, 06:42 AM #3
ironpony's Avatar
ironpony ironpony is online now
@therange
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Crofton/Davidsonville
Posts: 5,070
ironpony ironpony is online now
@therange
ironpony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Crofton/Davidsonville
Posts: 5,070
Wow, some good news for the 2A finally, gonna be interesting!
__________________
ICBW
ironpony is online now   Reply With Quote
Old December 19th, 2018, 06:42 AM #4
Bigfoot21075 Bigfoot21075 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Elkridge, MD
Posts: 1,199
Bigfoot21075 Bigfoot21075 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Elkridge, MD
Posts: 1,199
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToolAA View Post
So lets see how this plays out. Just about every thing the Administration has tried to do has been blocked in the courts.

What are the odds that they say this rule change is ok.
Yeah BUT it those things have been blocked in liberal courts. That is a BIG difference..... I guarantee the nutty 9th circuit will not lift a finger on this one.
__________________
"The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." -- (Thomas Jefferson)
Bigfoot21075 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 19th, 2018, 06:48 AM #5
Boxcab's Avatar
Boxcab Boxcab is offline
MSI EM
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: AA County
Posts: 5,664
Boxcab Boxcab is offline
MSI EM
Boxcab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: AA County
Posts: 5,664
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigfoot21075 View Post
Yeah BUT it those things have been blocked in liberal courts. That is a BIG difference..... I guarantee the nutty 9th circuit will not lift a finger on this one.
Was this filed with the Ninth?



.

Sent using the user limitations inherent of mobile devices.
__________________
Quote:
"I do find myself cursing the ghosts of the politicians and gun owners who let our 2nd Amendment rights degrade over the past century. Seven plus decades of being afraid to enthusiastically challenge any new ban against our gun rights has proven to be very foolish. Your rights will not preserve themselves; they must be pursued, secured and vigilantly maintained."
Boxcab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 19th, 2018, 06:58 AM #6
CrabcakesAndFootball's Avatar
CrabcakesAndFootball CrabcakesAndFootball is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Anne Arundel County
Posts: 680
CrabcakesAndFootball CrabcakesAndFootball is online now
Member
CrabcakesAndFootball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Anne Arundel County
Posts: 680
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxcab View Post
Was this filed with the Ninth?



.

Sent using the user limitations inherent of mobile devices.
DC
CrabcakesAndFootball is online now   Reply With Quote
Old December 19th, 2018, 06:59 AM #7
Uncle Duke's Avatar
Uncle Duke Uncle Duke is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Not Far Enough from the City
Posts: 5,906
Uncle Duke Uncle Duke is online now
Senior Member
Uncle Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Not Far Enough from the City
Posts: 5,906
Yes, DC.

Here it is here.

https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-co...injunction.pdf
Uncle Duke is online now   Reply With Quote
Old December 19th, 2018, 07:01 AM #8
CrabcakesAndFootball's Avatar
CrabcakesAndFootball CrabcakesAndFootball is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Anne Arundel County
Posts: 680
CrabcakesAndFootball CrabcakesAndFootball is online now
Member
CrabcakesAndFootball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Anne Arundel County
Posts: 680
Anyone know what district court judge has been assigned?
CrabcakesAndFootball is online now   Reply With Quote
Old December 19th, 2018, 07:09 AM #9
Bigfoot21075 Bigfoot21075 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Elkridge, MD
Posts: 1,199
Bigfoot21075 Bigfoot21075 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Elkridge, MD
Posts: 1,199
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxcab View Post
Was this filed with the Ninth?



.

Sent using the user limitations inherent of mobile devices.
No it was just an example of how the left delays Trumps agenda with a liberal court.
__________________
"The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." -- (Thomas Jefferson)
Bigfoot21075 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 19th, 2018, 07:18 AM #10
ironpony's Avatar
ironpony ironpony is online now
@therange
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Crofton/Davidsonville
Posts: 5,070
ironpony ironpony is online now
@therange
ironpony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Crofton/Davidsonville
Posts: 5,070
How do the DC courts lean? / Best place to file?
__________________
ICBW
ironpony is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

  Home Page > Forum List > Gun Rights and Legislation > National 2A Issues


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2019, Congregate Media, LP Privacy Policy Terms of Service