Verified! Cameras are not racist. They want to put DOT in charge of moving violations.
Remember folks, the ratio is 1:3 Aluminum to Ferric Oxide by mass.
Verified! Cameras are not racist. They want to put DOT in charge of moving violations.
That's when you pull "systemic" racism out and say that they speed or run lights because rules of the road are "white privilege" and "fascist".Soo.... what happens when a majority of the camera tickets go to <xyz> because the majority of people living in that area are <xyz>?
What sort of twisted logic follows from that?
No, because the idea of systemic bias is absolutely ludicrous, but the libs base decisions on emotion and feelings, we're taking away traffic enforcement from police.Just so I understand this correctly: we're gonna double down on cameras - which give it out highly regressive fines - so that the county doesn't actually need to confront possible issues of systemic bias in the police force?
Absolutely amazing.
At least speed cameras are easily disabled.
At least speed cameras are easily disabled.
There is some rumor that the County Council wants to allow citizens to enforce traffic laws? Be able to issue citations? Imagine all the Karens patrolling the roads!
There is some kind of online meeting tonight about it.
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1-g...B0TQ/viewform?ts=5f2d8927&edit_requested=true
A big part of this plan is putting red light and speed cameras everywhere.
Hank Dietle weeps
Pop Dietle is inconsolable
Or wait till a Karen pulls you over and claims that you pointed a gun at her. Easiest way to get your guns from you eva! They can make the claim and not be held accountable if they lie. It's every Demoncrats wet dream.
True but that means you voluntarily pulled over for Karen in the first place. I’ll take “Things I’ll never do” for $1,000 please Alex
G
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's when you pull "systemic" racism out and say that they speed or run lights because rules of the road are "white privilege" and "fascist".
The good thing about being liberal is you don't have to make sense, you just need to hit a certain amount of buzz words per ridiculous statement.
Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
Yes, but Jawando's assertion is that cameras aren't biased. Cops however are racist devils.
Remember folks, the ratio is 1:3 Aluminum to Ferric Oxide by mass.
Cameras aren't biased right up until some of the wrong people get tickets. Then you'll see stats pulled out of asses about how many people of what color got tickets.
This paper aims to explain whether police issue speeding tickets differently to
individuals based on their race or gender. I find that in the city of Lafayette, Louisiana,
the probability of a ticketed driver being a woman is significantly higher if the ticket
was issued by a police officer versus an automated source. The results are mixed
when considering race of a driver, suggesting non-systematic consideration of race
in issuing speeding tickets, though some evidence still exists that race is not completely
ignored. Conversely, the results imply that gender plays an important role when
police decide whether to ticket a speeding driver. Even when controlling for additional
factors like type of road where the ticket is issued, the results remain the same.