Remember folks, the ratio is 1:3 Aluminum to Ferric Oxide by mass.
MoCo Police
- Thread starter Schipperke
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
Remember folks, the ratio is 1:3 Aluminum to Ferric Oxide by mass.
That's when you pull "systemic" racism out and say that they speed or run lights because rules of the road are "white privilege" and "fascist".
The good thing about being liberal is you don't have to make sense, you just need to hit a certain amount of buzz words per ridiculous statement.
Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
Just so I understand this correctly: we're gonna double down on cameras - which give out highly regressive fines - so that the county doesn't actually need to confront possible issues of systemic bias in the police force?
Absolutely amazing.
Absolutely amazing.
Last edited:
No, because the idea of systemic bias is absolutely ludicrous, but the libs base decisions on emotion and feelings, we're taking away traffic enforcement from police.
The good news is that your can steal tags or not even have a license plate and just refuse to stop for the civilian traffic monitors now. That way, the cameras don't catch you...
Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
WeaponsCollector
EXTREME GUN OWNER
At least speed cameras are easily disabled.
If untrained, unarmed Karens start pulling people over, we're going to see how quickly a Karen can be disabled.
Traffic stops are dangerous.
Every traffic study has concluded cameras caused more accidents and injuries. It could also fails to let you face your accuser in court. They are a tax mechanism. Shorten yellow lights, lower speed limits. Rake in the cash at the expense of everyone.
https://bigthink.com/ideafeed/study-red-light-cameras-ineffective-cause-more-accidents
https://bigthink.com/ideafeed/study-red-light-cameras-ineffective-cause-more-accidents
- Jul 29, 2014
- 49,982
They would have never lasted if they were introduced when I was a teen. They would have been regularly torched. Testament to how wussified the modern youth are.
There is some rumor that the County Council wants to allow citizens to enforce traffic laws? Be able to issue citations? Imagine all the Karens patrolling the roads!
There is some kind of online meeting tonight about it.
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1-g...B0TQ/viewform?ts=5f2d8927&edit_requested=true
Anytime I see a ricer with a fart can on it I'll report it as being obnoxious, negilently driving and offensive to the world at large.
True but that means you voluntarily pulled over for Karen in the first place. I’ll take “Things I’ll never do” for $1,000 please Alex
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- Jul 29, 2014
- 49,982
whistlersmother
Peace through strength
Oi... off the the re-education camp for me - I'm not liberal minded enough.
Cameras aren't biased right up until some of the wrong people get tickets. Then you'll see stats pulled out of asses about how many people of what color got tickets.
It's easy to remember what you need, Amazon suggests the ingredients.
Attachments
- Feb 19, 2013
- 18,735
StantonCree
Watch your beer
- Jan 23, 2011
- 23,932
I will tell you this, draw your own conclusions. If the officer feels the stop is likely to end in a complaint there is a 100% chance a citation will be issued as justification for the stop.
If the officer believes the stop isn’t likely to result in a complaint the officer is more willing to issue a warning either written or verbal.
The day of the verbal warning should of died fir any cop with job preservation in their mind.
darn coppers.
